Contribution Notice - Who Signs for a Minor?

Many people create irrevocable life insurance trusts (ILIT) for the benefit of minor children. The common scenario is that the grantor will create an ILIT and his or her spouse will act as trustee of such trust.

Because ILITs are established as Crummey trusts, a contribution notice should be sent out to the beneficiaries whenever a contribution is made to the trust. When the children are minors - who signs off on the notice, the Grantor or the Trustee?

General consensus amongst practitioners is that the Trustee parent should sign the notice under the theory that if the Grantor parent acts as if he or she has a withdrawal power, then he or she is maintaining an impermissible incident of ownership in the trust. Such retention of power might cause the trust to be includible in the Grantor's estate for estate tax purpose, thereby nullifying the reason the trust was probably created in the first place.

For second to die life insurance trusts, neither parent should act as signer for a minor child. Accordingly, to be very safe, a guardian ad litem should be appointed, in a limited capacity, to sign the contribution notices. Practitioners should try to avoid creating second to die life insurance trusts until the designated beneficiaries of the trust have reached the age of majority.

Nuts and Bolts of Life Insurance Trusts

Life Insurance Trusts – The most common form of inter vivos irrevocable trust is the Life Insurance Trust (ILIT). Since the grantor of the trust has no desire to use the proceeds of this trust during his life, and because the value of the insurance at the time of the grantor’s death can be quite high, it is a very popular mechanism for reducing or avoiding a grantor’s estate tax liability.

a. When creating a life insurance trust, it is important to know whether the client will be buying the insurance through the insurance trust or if they will be transferring in an existing insurance policy.

1) If at all possible, the client should always have the trust buy the insurance because:

i It avoids I.R.C. §2035 which states that a person’s gross estate for estate tax purposes includes certain assets that have been transferred out of the person’s estate within three years of death. Accordingly, if a person transfers an insurance policy to an insurance trust and dies within three years of when the gift to the trust was made, the full amount of the proceeds will be subject to both the Federal and New Jersey Estate Taxes.

ii It avoids having to determine the value of the existing policy at the time of the transfer. This value is known as the interpolated terminal reserve.

iii We are sure the insurance actually gets into the trust. All too often a planner creates the insurance trust and then it never gets funded, exposing the practitioner to unnecessary liability.

2) If the client will be contributing existing insurance to a trust:

i The value of the insurance at the time of the transfer is a gift to the Crummey beneficiaries of the trust.

ii Care must be taken when selecting the beneficiaries of the trust to ensure that there are enough beneficiaries to shelter the value of the gift.

iii The trust must be funded with enough liquid assets in the event someone does wish to exercise their withdrawal rights.

b. The trust should be established as a Crummey Trust.

1) A Crummey Trust is named after Clifford Crummey, the first taxpayer to use this type of trust successfully.

2) A Crummey trust is designed to provided a limited withdrawal right to certain beneficiaries in an irrevocable trust so that transfers to the trust are eligible for the annual gift tax exclusion.

3) The more Crummey beneficiaries there are, the greater the gift that may be made to the trust without having to pay a gift tax. Crummey beneficiaries may not just be named at random, because they do have a real right to withdraw the money that is put into the trust.

4) Generally, a 30 day withdrawal right is considered adequate, but there is no clear minimum.

5) Particular care must be taken when drafting the Crummey power to ensure that the power lapses only the extent of the greater of $5000 or 5%. Any greater lapse will be considered a gift by that withdrawal beneficiary to the other beneficiaries of the trust.

6) The trustee should have broad powers to satisfy any withdrawal rights. All Crummey withdrawal rights should be satisfied either against the contribution or the property of the trust, including any insurance policy or fractional interests in the insurance policy. This will provide substance to a Crummey withdrawal right.

c. Tax aspects

1) The trust should generally be created as an Intentionally Defective Grantor trust, I.R.C. §677, so that although the assets of the trust are out of the grantor’s estate, during the life of the Grantor any income received by the trust is taxed to the Grantor rather than being taxed to the trust. This avoids having to file a Form 1041 income tax return for the trust and it provides an additional gift to the beneficiaries in an amount equal to the income taxes actually paid. Frequently this is done with a power to substitute trust assets, other than the insurance, with assets of an equivalent value to the trust in a non fiduciary manner I.R.C. § 675(4).

2) Upon the death of the grantor, the trust will either be taxed as a simple or complex trust depending upon the terms of the trust.

3) The practitioner must consider whether the Grantor’s Generation Skipping Tax Exemption should be allocated to the ILIT. The Code was revised under EGTRRA to provide an automatic allocation of the Grantor’s GST exemption in many cases and this is not always the most desirable result. A grantor may opt in or opt out of having the automatic allocation on a timely filed gift tax return.

d. Planning Considerations

1) The Grantor should NEVER be trustee of his or her own ILIT.

2) It may sound obvious, but it is important to counsel clients that once money goes into an irrevocable trust, the money no longer belongs to them and they will have difficulty getting the money back.

3) If the Trustee is the Grantor’s spouse, care must be taken when making contributions to the trust to ensure that the Trustee spouse is not making any contributions. (i.e. Never contribute joint or community property to the trust or write a check to the trust from a joint account or a business account).

4) ILITs are somewhat expense to establish and maintain for many clients, particularly those who have large estates due strictly to the amount of insurance they buy. Consideration should be given to naming a child as the owner and beneficiary of the policy as a means to save money for the client while receiving many of the same tax benefits.

5) The client should make sure that the insurance premiums are paid on an annual basis to minimize the maintenance fees. If multiple insurance policies are in one trust, try to convince the insurance carriers to have the same due date for the premiums.

6) The life insurance trusts is a particularly useful planning tool for same sex couples and unmarried couples because it provides a means to give the decedent’s significant other a large sum of money tax free, yet control the money’s ultimate destination.

e. Types of Life Insurance - Regardless of whether a client owns a term, whole life, or variable life insurance policy, if the value of the policy and the client’s other assets are in excess of the New Jersey Estate Tax threshold, it is advisable to discuss the benefits of the ILIT.

1) Term Life Insurance – These policies by their nature are designed to last for short period of time to cover a particular type of risk. The premiums on these policies are typically low, and a contribution of an existing policy to an insurance trust is relatively easy because of the low value of the policy.

2) Whole Life Insurance – These policies are designed to build up a cash value to produce a guaranteed return that will ultimately pay for the insurance premium. The premiums can be quite substantial, which is important to know when calculating the number of Crummey beneficiaries that must be named. A contribution of a large whole life policy to an ILIT may result in a gift tax no matter how comprehensive the planning because of the size of the insurance.

3) Variable Life Insurance – This type of policy is similar to the whole life insurance except that instead of having a guaranteed return, the rate is variable. Since most people are not good investors, be wary of advising this product.

4) Second to Die Insurance - A Second to Die Insurance Trust is different from a typical ILIT in one substantial and obvious way - the insurance benefits are not paid until the second to die.

i Practitioners should ensure that neither spouse is ever eligible to serve as trustee nor made a Crummey beneficiary.

ii Since this trust is not for the benefit of the surviving spouse, the clients should be sure that the surviving spouse has enough funds to live on absent the trust funds.

iii These trusts are particularly beneficial for clients interested in dynasty trusts as more insurance can purchased for a lower premium amount.

f. Insurance Trusts Established Pursuant to Divorce or Separation– Frequently Divorce attorneys draft provisions in a separation agreement or a divorce decree that call for an insurance trust to be created for the benefit of the children of the marriage. Terms of the trust are rarely spelled out with any specificity.

1) In the event that the person who is required to be insured passes prior to the creation of an ILIT, the courts can impose a constructive trust for the benefit of the children. (A constructive trust is an implied trust established by operation of law.) The terms of the trust are in the judge’s discretion, rather than in either the form that the decedent, or surviving parent, would want.

2) Planning Considerations

i Frequently a divorce or separation agreement will say what amount of insurance a person should have without any consideration for who should be trustee, the tax consequences or the ages at which the children should have access to the money. Occasionally, inappropriate provisions are included. Thought must be given how to address these concerns, particularly in light of the fact that these two individuals may not be on good terms.

ii Payment for the trust. I have yet to see a divorce decree or separation agreement that contemplates who will actually pay for the insurance trust. This is often a sticking point for many clients.

iii Compliance. Working with an unfriendly trustee or grantor can severely complicate compliance with both the tax laws and properly funding the trust.

g. Management of Insurance Trusts

1) The management of an insurance trust from an investment standpoint is quite simple. Most insurance trusts do not have assets other than the insurance itself.

2) The complexity comes when trying to explain the maintenance and funding requirements of the trust to clients. Further complicating matters, often clients will try to manage the trust completely on their own to save on costs. The practitioner must take extreme care when allowing this to happen because the practitioner will still be potentially liable.

3) Funding the Trust

i Checking accounts must be created in the name of the trust (and if the Grantor does not have an individual checking account, the Grantor may also have to create a checking account to fund the trust). Many practitioners like to get a separate tax identification number for the ILIT. If the trust is an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT), it is not necessary, but it is still a good idea in the event a creditor does an asset search using the Grantor’s Social Security Number.

ii Insurance must either be purchased by the trust or transferred into the trust. This requires completing insurance forms that designate the trust as the owner and beneficiary of the policy.

4) Sending the annual Crummey letter. As soon as practical after the trust is funded, a letter must be sent to the designated Crummey beneficiaries to advise them of their withdrawal rights. These letters should be acknowledged by the beneficiaries (or their guardians) and maintained by the attorney (or trustee).

i After 30 days (or whatever the relevant Crummey time period is) the Trustee may use the gift from the Grantor to pay the insurance proceeds.

5) To avoid problems with I.R.C. §2035 and §2036 (which would bring the insurance back into the gross estate of the Grantor), it is important that the Grantor contains no impermissible control over the trust and should never be the trustee. The Grantor may be given limited ability to hire and fire Trustees.

Asset Protect Trusts vs. Family Limited Liability Companies

Occasionally, people who are interested in asset protection ask me what is more appropriate, a trust or some sort of FLC or FLP. Here is my response:

An asset protection trust is more secure than an FLC, but it is also more costly to maintain (high annual fees for an independent trustee) and you give up more control. The more money you have and the more at risk you are for a lawsuit, the more you want to set up a trust. For asset protection trusts to work properly, you must give up almost all decision making power over the assets (to a trusted advisor), and you will become, at best, a discretionary beneficiary of such trust.

A single person FLC does not offer much protection, but certainly some. A two person FLC without an operating agreement offers decent protection from any lawsuit arising out of assets in the FLC, but little protection for misdeeds done outside the FLC. With an operating agreement limiting distributions, you get much more protection and that is why there is more of a setup cost. This structure is good for people who really don’t want to part with their assets and/or think they will need it in the future. These receive more protection over time as the Grantor transfers shares of this down to issue (usually at a discount) because of the lack of marketability and lack of control.

There are many types of Asset Protection Trusts. Inter vivos ones (trusts set up during the Grantor’s life) are invariably more costly than one’s set up on death. Something as simple as a traditional ILIT can make a great Asset Protection Trust, especially if funded with Whole Life Insurance. Self Settled Asset Protection Trusts (where the Grantor is also a beneficiary) are available in a few jurisdictions such as Delaware, Alaska, Nevada and New Hampshire. These are high end domestic asset protection trusts. For even greater protection, we can go offshore.

So, basically, it comes back to what you, the client, is trying to accomplish.

Estate Planning When Contemplating Divorce

Once a divorce is final, your former spouse, and relatives of your former spouse, are generally not entitled to inherit any money from you upon your death. But what should you do during the lengthy time of your separation leading up to your divorce?

Ripping up a Will that gave everything to your surviving spouse does not solve your problems. New Jersey’s newest probate law (N.J.S.A. 3B:5-3), enacted in 2005, states that you are married and die without a Will a large portion of your assets, possibly all your assets, will pass to your surviving spouse. Accordingly, if you die before your divorce is final, your surviving spouse may still be entitled to all your assets (marital and non-marital). Additionally, your surviving spouse will be entitled to be the Administrator of your estate. This may be completely contrary to your real wishes.

If you do not want the person you are divorcing to receive all your assets, creating a new Will gives you greater control over where your assets go and allows you to pick your own Executor.

When drafting a new Will, keep in mind that any persons that you name under your Will to act as trustee or guardian for your children might be affected by your divorce. Accordingly, if you name a relative of your former spouse as a trustee, he or she may be ineligible to serve as a trustee of any trusts for your children unless clear instructions are given. You should also revisit your guardianship designations to make sure they are still appropriate given your current circumstances.

However, even with a new Will, you usually cannot completely cut out your spouse. Depending upon how far along you are in the process of your divorce, New Jersey’s Elective Share Statute may allow your surviving spouse to claim up to 1/3 of your estate. However, even if your surviving spouse is unable to collect his or her elective share, the Court may intervene if it thinks it would be inequitable to completely cut out your surviving spouse. In 1990, the New Jersey Supreme Court utilized its equitable powers to grant a surviving spouse an equitable share of the marital assets.

In addition to writing a new Will, to further protect yourself, your divorce attorney should consider provisions in your separation agreement whereby you and your spouse waive your right to claim the elective share of your spouse. Your divorce attorney may also wish to consider submitting a motion to the Court to prevent your spouse from making beneficiary changes to his or her life insurance, retirement plans and educational savings accounts.

Finally, do not forget to speak with your parents and siblings about their estate planning documents. If they have money passing to your spouse under the terms of their Wills, or if you or your spouse is named as a guardian, they may wish to update their Wills as well.

Irrevocable Trusts

There are many different types of irrevocable trusts. The most popular irrevocable trusts include:

1. life insurance trusts;
2. asset protection trusts;
3. charitable trusts;
4. trusts created upon death (such as QTIP trusts and bypass trusts); and
5. special needs trusts.

Generally, an irrevocable trust is designed to prevent its terms from being modified in the future. As a practical matter, what this means is that a person (the Grantor) creates a document (the Irrevocable Trust) outlining how his or her beneficiaries should receive any assets that are placed into the trust.

The Irrevocable Trust document itself has provisions which state that the Grantor may not make changes or modifications to the trust. Unlike a Revocable Trust, the Grantor of an Irrevocable Trust gives up all control once the trust is created. There are times when such trusts can be later modified, whether by court or by consent of all the beneficiaries, but never by the grantor alone.

Frequently people also create an Irrevocable Trust because once assets are transferred to such trust they will receive favorable estate and inheritance tax treatment. Assets in Irrevocable Trusts receive favorable tax treatment because they are excluded from the gross estate of the grantor at the time of the grantor’s death.

Another reason people also create irrevocable trusts is to provide as a means of protecting the assets in the trusts. By giving up control of the assets (in a non fraudulent way), a potential creditor may not sue the Grantor and try to claim against the assets in the trust.

In most states, including New Jersey, a Grantor may not be a beneficiary of an asset protection trust. However, a few states do allow self settled spendthrift trusts.

Revocable Inter Vivos Trust (a/k/a the Grantor Trust)

The Revocable Grantor Trust is a favorite of practitioners who wish to help their clients avoid probate. The other advantage to the trust is that for individuals who wish to keep their family secrets out of the public domain, it provides a means to keep their estate planning wishes private.

1. The major benefit of the Grantor Trust is that it provides a method for managing the Grantor’s assets, which is particularly useful in the event of incapacity.
2. It is valuable for clients who are not sure if they plan to stay domiciled in New Jersey and may move to a part of the country where avoiding probate is of utmost importance.
3. Planning considerations

a. When transferring real property into any trust, there is a cost associated with the transfer. Additionally, there may be real estate transfer fees and if there is a mortgage on the property, the mortgage company may have an issue with the transfer.
b. Under Revenue Ruling 85-45, the sale of a person’s principal residence held in trust qualified for the I.R.C. §121 capital gains tax exclusion provided the person and trust otherwise qualified for the exclusion.
c. Probate of property in New Jersey is not as expensive or time consuming as in other jurisdictions, so the cost of establishing the trust may not always be justified.

4. Tax aspects

a. While the Grantor is alive, this trust will be ignored for tax purposes and taxed to the Grantor. The trust may also use the Grantor’s social security number until this time.
b. Upon the death of the Grantor, the taxation of the trust will be dependent upon the terms of the trust. A new tax ID number will usually be appropriate.

5. Administration

a. During the life of the Grantor.

1) The administration of Grantor trusts is quite simple while the Grantor is alive as the Grantor who acts as his own Trustee generally has complete control over all the assets as if he owned the assets outright.
2) At any time a Grantor may terminate (or revoke) the trust and receive all of his assets back. This may be especially useful if there is a third party Trustee who is not doing what the Grantor wants.
3) All bank accounts and titling of assets should be made as follows: “[Trustee Name], as Trustee of the [Trust Name]”.
4) To avoid confusion, a Trustee should always indicate when he or she is acting on behalf of the trust rather than in an individual capacity. Accordingly, checks, letters and any other documents should be signed as Trustee.

b. Upon the death of the grantor, the trust turns into an irrevocable trust. The administration will be dependent upon the actual terms of the trust instrument.

1) Unlike trusts created under a Will, the Trustee does not need to acquire Letters of Trusteeship from the Surrogate. This is both a time saver and a small cost saver.
2) Summaries of various common irrevocable trusts to be discussed later.

Japanese Inheritance Tax vs. US Estate Tax

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF
JAPANESE INHERITANCE AND GIFT TAXES
vs.
AMERICAN ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES

NOTE: This information has been updated. The new post can be found at: http://willstrustsestates.blogspot.com/2014/08/japanese-inheritance-tax-vs-us-estate.html

I. Estate Taxes

A. America

1. Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Tax on Worldwide property (credit for taxes paid to foreign countries)
b. Exemption of $2,000,000 in 2006; $3,500,000 in 2009; unlimited in 2010; and back to $1,000,000 in 2011)
c. Tax between 18%-46%
d. Unlimited Marital Deduction for Surviving Spouse if a citizen

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. Tax only on Property in the United States (Cash in foreign banks and foreign stocks are not taxed)
b. Exemption of $13,000
c. Tax of between 18%-49% on rest
d. Unlimited Marital deduction if Surviving Spouse a citizen

B. Japan (Actually an Inheritance tax, not an estate tax)

1. Japanese Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Exemption of ¥50,000,000 + (¥10,000,000 for each statutory heir); Possible additional exemption for insurance money, retirement savings, and money left to handicapped individuals
b. Tax between (10%-50%)
c. For property outside of Japan, a beneficiary that acquires property will be subject to Japanese inheritance tax if the beneficiary is a Japanese national and the beneficiary was domiciled in Japan at any time during the five years preceding the receipt of the inheritance.
d. A surviving spouse is entitled to a tax deduction. This is a complex formula based upon who is living at the time of the Decedent's death and where the money goes. Generally, a surviving spouse can deduct about 1/2 to 2/3 of the tax.

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. If beneficiary is not Japanese and not living in Japan and property is not in Japan, appears Country where property located will tax such property.
b. If there is a tax, it appears a surviving spouse is entitled to the same marital tax deduction as for Japanese citizens.

II. Gift Taxes

A. America (18%-46%)

1. Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Tax on all gift transfers of Worldwide property
b. Annual exemption of $12,000 per person/per donee (unlimited gifts for donees if different donors)
c. An annual gift to a non-citizen, permanent resident spouse, of $120,000 is available.
d. Lifetime exemption of $1,000,000
e. Gifts may be split with spouse

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. Tax on all gift transfers of US Property (including Cash and Stocks in US companies)
b. Annual exemption of $12,000 per person/per donee (unlimited gifts for donees if different donors)
c. No Lifetime exemption
d. Gifts may be split with spouse

B. Japan (10%-50%)

1. Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Annual exemption of ¥1,100,000 for each beneficiary (beneficiary taxed after this)
b. One time spouse exemption of ¥20,000,000
c. For property outside of Japan, a donee that acquires property will be subject to Japanese gift tax if the donee is a Japanese national and the donee was domiciled in Japan at any time during the five years preceding the receipt of the gift.

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. Annual exemption of ¥1,100,000 for each beneficiary(unclear – enforcement is almost impossible)

III. Generation Skipping Taxes (Taxes on gifts or bequests to grandchildren)

A. America

1. Approximately $2,000,000 in 2006 is exempt; $3,500,000 in 2009 is exempt; there is no GST tax in 2010; $1,000,000 exemption in 2011 (but indexed for inflation)
2. Tax of 55% on rest

B. Japan

1. None

For more information on Japanese taxes, the Japanese government has a nice website in English with some helpful facts. This is a link directly to the inheritance tax information: http://www.mof.go.jp/english/tax/taxes2006e_d.pdf

(Revised on 2/2/09 to correct Japanese tax rates)