Joint Trusts - A Great Planning Opportunity for Non-Traditional Couples and Blended Families

Creating an estate plan for clients who are in non-traditional relationships or are part of a blended family can be very tricky.
  

Why is Estate Planning for Non-Traditional Couples So Tricky?

Let's assume a hypothetical fact situation where you have a women (Jane) with $4M in assets.  She is a widow and has 2 children.  Now let's also assume that she is in a committed relationship with a person (Alex) who has $2M in assets, and Alex has three children.  Finally, let's assume that they agreed to set up a joint bank account and that they want to buy a house together worth about $1M, with Jane putting up three-quarters of the money for the house.  

Typically, the clients in this scenario will want to take care of each other, but they also want to ensure that a certain amount of their assets go to their respective children.  Let's assume the specific goal for Jane and Alex is that the surviving partner can have the joint bank account and use the house for the rest of their life, but everything else goes to their respective children.  To accomplish this, they buy the house as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and create Wills leaving everything else to their respective children.

In this hypothetical, if Jane dies first, the house and the joint bank account go to Alex because they are joint assets and supersede the Will.  When Alex dies, his $2M plus the house goes to his children.  This is not necessarily a far result for Jane's children.  Alternatively, if Alex dies first, the house and the bank account goes to Jane, and then upon her death, it all goes to her children, cutting out Alex's descendants with respect to the joint assets.  As you can see, the problem with this traditional plan is that one partner dies and the survivor takes the house and bank account and it cuts out the descendants of the first client to die with respect to the joint assets.

Why a Joint Trust Can Be an Important Estate Planning Tool for Non-Traditional Couples

One of the best ways to handle a situation like this is for Jane and Alex to set up a joint trust.  The trust could be funded with the house and cash (in whatever amount they like).  While Jane and Alex are alive, the trust could be revocable and they could have complete control over it to do whatever they like.  The trust becomes really powerful when the first partner dies (or becomes incapacitated), because we can then make the trust Irrevocable.  While we can customize these types of trusts in many ways, most people want to guarantee that the survivor can: live in the house for the rest of their lifetime, sell it and buy other real estate, or sell it and have an income stream to live off of.  

The main benefit to this type of trust planning is that we can provide a much safer way of ensuring that ALL of Jane and Alex's descendants receive whatever is left over when the survivor dies.  Moreover, we can make sure that their descendants receive money in a way that is more fair based upon need or based upon how Jane and Alex contributed funds towards the trust.  In this example, since Jane is putting up $750,000 towards the house, the trust can say that, following the deaths of both Jane and Alex, the remainder of the trust assets go 3/4 to Jane's children and 1/4 to Alex's children.  

Initially, Jane and Alex could be in control of the Trust (making them the Trustees).  We can also have a system in place so that one of Jane's children steps up as co-trustee if something happens to Jane and one of Alex's children steps up as co-trustee if something happens to Alex.  If Jane's children and Alex's children can't work together, we can also have a neutral trustee appointed. 

Can Anyone Create a Joint Trust?

Anyone can create a joint trust.  The type of trust I am describing in this post works for unmarried or married couples. 

Are There Any Downsides to Creating a Joint Trust?

When creating any estate plan, one of the downsides is the cost to create the plan.  Creating a custom plan like this will certainly cost more than simply titling assets in joint name.  However, the more money over which you are trying to control the disposition, the more it is worth setting up this type of trust.

Another potential downside to creating a joint trust is that, depending upon its structure, the trust may need a tax identification number and a tax return will need to be filed for the trust for any income earned.  

It should also be pointed out though that if the couple is unmarried and they live in a jurisdiction with an inheritance tax (like New Jersey or Pennsylvania), this structure would trigger the inheritance tax on both the first to die and likely the second to die.  However, for unmarried couples, this tax would be incurred on the first to die regardless of whether or not a joint trust was utilized.  In New Jersey, the inheritance tax could be avoided if the couple agrees to enter into a NJ Domestic Partnership agreement.

How Do I Create a Joint Trust?

If you would like to know more about estate planning for non-traditional couples or setting up a joint trust, we would happy to speak with you to so that it could be properly customized to meet your needs.  Kevin A. Pollock, Esq., LL.M. is an attorney licensed to practice in NJ, NY, PA and FL.  Kevin Pollock meets with clients in Lawrenceville, NJ and in Boca Raton, FL by appointment only.  Kevin may be reached at (609) 818-1555.  

You Can Create a Pet Trust - Just Like the One For Choupette

According to multiple news sources, when the creative director and fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld died on February 19, 2019, he left his famous cat, Choupette, a significant amount of money in trust.

Pet trusts are now quite common, and specifically authorized by statute in most jurisdictions.  Many people consider pets as a part of the family, and want them to be cared for as such.  A pet trust can provide money to pay for a caregiver, food, pet supplies, and a veterinarian.  It can also provide a place for your pet to live (or board), and in the case of Choupette, a personal chef.

Most estate planning attorneys who create pet trusts will provide a check and balance on the trustee, the caregiver, and the remainder beneficiary.  In other words, we do not recommend that the person in charge of caring for the pet be the one managing the money and the ultimate remainder beneficiary when the pet dies, as this would create a perverse incentive for the caregiver to do a bad job in caring for your beloved pet.

For people who do not want to create trust, they can always leave money to a caregiver (or charitable organization) with the hope that the caregiver will maintain the pet properly.  The benefit of a trust is that it makes the arrangement more legally enforceable and provides greater oversight.

New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Florida have statutes based upon the Uniform Trust Code.  The NJ Pet Trust Statute can be found at:  3B:31-24 Trust for care of animal.  The Pennsylvania Pet Trust Statute can be found at: 20 Pa.C.S.A. § 7738.  Trust for Care of an animal.  The Florida Pet Trust Statute can be found at: Florida Statute 736.0408  Trust for care of an animal.  The State of New York also has a statute specifically authorizing the creation of a pet trust, which can be found at NY Est Pow & Trusts L § 7-8.1 Trusts for pets. 

It should be noted that the NJ statute, enacted in 2015, amended a previous version of the law that limited Pet trusts to 21 years.  It also clarified that a Pet trust could be created under a revocable trust document, not just as part of a trust created under a Will.

It should also be noted that living money to a pet (in trust or to a caregiver) will likely give rise to an inheritance tax in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. 

What to Think About Before Meeting With an Estate Planning Lawyer

I am happy to announce that we have finally finished creating a series of short videos regarding the estate planning and estate administration process.  Here is our third video in which Kevin A. Pollock, Esq., LLM is being interviewed by Pierson W. Backes, Esq., the head of our estate litigation department, regarding the things a person should think about before meeting with an estate planning attorney.


Some of the things people should think about include where you want your money to go, who you want to be in charge of your estate, who you would want to act as trustee of any trusts you create, and who should be guardians of any minor or disabled children. 

The role of the attorney should be help people put the legal structure in place, including setting up trusts, and to make the plan tax efficient.  A good estate planning attorney will also help you understand the options on how to get money to different people.  For example, if you want to leave $100,000 to a sibling, it might be more tax efficient to name them as beneficiary of a life insurance policy rather than naming them as a beneficiary under your Will,

To learn more about estate planning or hiring an elder law Attorney, please visit us at: https://pollockfirm.com/

Excellent Social Security Strategy Link

As part of the estate planning process, we frequently need to analyze how much a person is likely to have upon death.  As part of an overall wealth analysis, this invariably leads to questions such as:

1. How much are you earning now?
2. When are you expecting to retire?
3. How much should you gift to your children to minimize taxes while still having enough to live on?
4. What do you expect to earn/spend in retirement?
5. How much are you likely to receive from Social Security?

Many clients are concerned with running out of money and have a lot of difficulty calculating the best strategies for how and when to start claiming their Social Security.  After all, the strategy of wait until as late as possible simply doesn't work for everyone.  From a pure return on investment strategy, it might be worthwhile for a low income earner in a marriage to take the benefits early. This is particularly true when there is a big age disparity between spouses.

In looking around online, I found a wonderful website to help you analyze the best strategies.  The site Open Social Security has a great calculator for spouses that let's you know, based upon your ages and the amount Social Security expects you to receive at full retirement, when is the best time for each of you claim your social security. 

We still recommend speaking with your attorney and other advisors to fully flush out all the issues, such as factoring in the health of your and your spouse, discussing when other income should come in, and what type of guaranteed money is otherwise likely to be available.  Nevertheless, this is definitely one of the better calculators I've seen.

Happy holidays!

Why You Should Have A Will

I am happy to announce that we have finally finished creating a series of short videos regarding the estate planning and estate administration process.  Here is our first video on the importance of having a Will.

What is a Disclaimer Trust?

A Disclaimer Trust is a special type of trust often created under a Will (or as a sub-trust of a revocable living trust) that generally allows a person to refuse an asset and still benefit from it under a trust.  In order to understand Disclaimer Trusts, you first need to understand what a disclaimer is and what happens when you make a disclaimer so that you can understand the purpose and mechanics of Disclaimer Trusts.

What is a Disclaimer?

A disclaimer is literally when someone refuses to accept money or an inheritance.  A person can disclaim a gift, an inheritance, an interest in a trust, or certain powers.  (Let's call this the "Disclaimed Interest".) A person can also make a partial disclaimer, such as disclaiming half of their inheritance (although special rules apply to this).

What Happens When a Disclaimer Is Made?

When a Disclaimer is done correctly, it has the affect of treating the person who disclaims as if he or she died prior to the Disclaimed Interest being made.  So, if a Wife is disclaiming an inheritance from her Husband, it treats the Wife as if she had died before the Husband for whatever amount Wife disclaims.  Generally, in order for a disclaimer to be effective for tax purposes, it must be done within nine months from the date of death AND the beneficiary cannot have accepted the Disclaimed Interest.

Since the Disclaiming party is treated as if he or she died before the gift or bequest was made, the Disclaimed Interest will pass to the next person in line who is suppose to receive that.  For example, if a Will says, everything to my spouse, and upon the death of my spouse, it all goes to my children, then if the surviving spouse disclaims her inheritance, it would all go to the children.  However, that may not be the result the surviving spouse wants.  She might want to have access to that money during her lifetime and only have it go to the children upon her death.

What is the Purpose of a Disclaimer Trust?

The purpose of a Disclaimer Trust is that it allows a surviving spouse to inherit money, but to do so in a way that would be more tax efficient for the descendants of the person creating the Will.

This tax efficiency is probably best illustrated by two examples of how it affected NJ residents prior to 2017.  Back when NJ had a state estate tax, it often wasn't beneficial for the surviving spouse to inherit everything outright. New Jersey had a 'use it or lose it' state estate tax exemption of $675,000.  So, if a married couple owned $1,350,000 of assets, and when one spouse dies they wish everything to go for the benefit of the survivor and then down to the children:

1. Example 1 - Upon the first to die, everything goes to surviving spouse outright.  When the second spouse dies, she would only have one NJ estate tax exemption of $675,000.  So assuming no growth in assets, the remaining $675,000 would have been subject to the NJ estate tax, resulting in a tax of almost $55,000.
2. Example 2 - Upon the first to die, everything goes into trust for the surviving spouse.  This utilized the estate tax exemption of the first person to die.  The surviving spouse still had access to the funds in trust, but when she died and everything went to the children, there was no NJ estate tax because she also had an estate tax exemption.

Under What Circumstances Should a Surviving Spouse Disclaim Assets into a Disclaimer Trust?

A surviving spouse should disclaim an inheritance into a Disclaimer Trust when it would be tax efficient to do so.  If we go back to our example above, let's say the couple with $1,350,000 has their estate dwindle down to $500,000, or they move to another estate without a state estate tax, or the estate tax exemption has increased well beyond what they expect to have when the surviving spouse dies, there would be no point in the surviving spouse disclaiming. 

If it is highly like that the surviving spouse will live in a state that has a state estate tax, and it the surviving spouses assets (including the inheritance) would be above that state's estate tax thresh-hold, then it often beneficial for the surviving spouse to disclaim the assets into a Disclaimer Trust.

(Incidentally, before the federal government had portability between spouses of the federal estate tax exemption, this was a part of practically every single Will for married couples.  Since portability and the increase the federal estate tax thresh-holds, fewer attorneys are including these clauses unless the state has an estate tax.)

When Should a Surviving Spouse Disclaim Assets into a Disclaimer Trust?

For a disclaimer to be effective for tax purposes, it must be done within nine months from the date of death.  The nice thing about Disclaimer Trust planning for couples is that it allows the surviving spouse to take a look at all the facts and circumstances when the first spouse dies.  

It is important to remember that the funding of a Disclaimer Trust is always optional.  A disclaimer Trust will NOT get funded unless the surviving spouse makes files a qualified disclaimer according to local state rules.  You can analyze your wealth situation, need for cash, look at the tax laws and figure out what is best for your situation.

What are the Tax Consequences of a Disclaimer?

If a Surviving Spouse disclaims within the nine period and does so according the rules set out by the IRS (basically not taking the property first, not directing where the disclaimed property goes, and complying with state rules on disclaimers), then the disclaimed amount will be includible in the decedent's taxable estate.  This is generally what you want as you are disclaiming to utilize the decedent's estate tax exemption amount.

The person disclaiming must be careful not to disclaim too much, otherwise that might trigger an estate tax on the first to die.

It should be noted that failing to disclaim in a timely fashion or in a way proscribed by the IRS will result in the disclaimer be treated as a taxable gift by the Disclaimant.  Basically, it's as if the surviving spouse accepted the property and then gifted it away.

Alternatives to a Disclaimer Trust Plan

The question I always ask my clients is whether or not they want to guarantee that money go into trust for the surviving spouse.  If they want to guarantee the use of an estate tax exemption or if they want to protect the money from a future spouse, we wouldn't do a Disclaimer Trust plan, we would just automatically fund a trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse upon the death of the first spouse instead of giving the surviving spouse the option to fund it upon the first to die.

However, many people aren't concerned about the surviving spouse remarrying, and they want to keep things simple.  Usually in those cases, we would allow the surviving spouse to disclaim their inheritance into a Disclaimer Trust upon the first to die if there is a tax reason to do so.

If the surviving spouse really doesn't need the money, he or she can also take the money and gift it to the children (or wherever you wish). Remember, this can result in a taxable gift.  However, with the high estate and gift tax exemption limits ($11.2M per person in 2018), most people will not actually incur a gift tax unless you make a very large gift.

Who Can Make a Disclaimer?

Throughout this post I have talked about the ability of a Surviving Spouse to make a disclaimer, and while anyone can disclaim an asset, only a Surviving Spouse can disclaim an asset in to a trust for the benefit of himself or herself.  The general rule for anyone other than a surviving spouse is that you cannot disclaim money and still benefit from it.  Accordingly, your child can never disclaim into a trust for his or her benefit.  

On the other hand, attorneys frequently create estate plans that give money to child, but if child dies, her share goes to grandchild in trust.  If the child is wealthy, she might not want or need the money and then Child can disclaim funds into grandchild's trust and act as trustee of that trust.

Problems With Disclaimer Trust Planning

The biggest problem with Disclaimer Trust planning is that the surviving spouse often fails to make an effective disclaimer.  If the surviving spouse doesn't seek counsel within nine months of the first spouse's date of death, or they transfer money into their own name, then an effective disclaimer cannot be made.

Balancing Estate Tax Planning and Capital Gains Tax Planning

One of the trickiest aspects of deciding whether or not to do a disclaimer is calculating whether a disclaimer will minimize overall taxes and expenses.  If the assets are in the surviving spouse's name, it can be subject to extra estate taxes.  If the assets are titled in the name of a Disclaimer Trust, it could produce additional capital gains taxes, accounting fees and other costs.  I would strongly urge you to consult with a tax attorney before exercising a disclaimer.

How Do I Know if My Estate Plan Includes a Disclaimer Trust?

The Will or Revocable Trust usually says something to the effect of "I leave everything to my spouse, but if my spouse disclaims all or a part of his or her inheritance, such disclaimed portion will be distributed pursuant to the Disclaimer Trust created hereunder."

A surviving spouse should be careful of disclaiming if no Disclaimer Trust is established under the Will or Revocable Living Trust as a disclaimer could have the effect of sending everything to the children.

If a Disclaimer Trust is Primarily for Married Couples Living in a State That Has a State Estate Tax, Why Do My Documents Have a Disclaimer Trust?

Disclaimer Trust planning is most useful in states still have a state estate tax.  However, many attorneys will automatically put it in the estate planning documents for a married couple even if they live in a state that doesn't have a state estate tax just in case the client moves to a jurisdiction that does have the tax.  Moreover, it was common practice to do Disclaimer Trust planning prior to 2001 when the federal government allowed spouses to port their unused federal estate tax exemption to the surviving spouse.  Accordingly, there is a historical component to this in all states.

Is there Any Harm to Having a Disclaimer Trust in my Will or Revocable Trust Even Though I Know I Will Never Use It?

Attorneys never like to use the word "never".  So, I will say that it would be very surprising if there is any harm in having a Disclaimer Trust in your Will or other estate planning documents.  It is a great failsafe.

7 Simple Ways to Minimize the Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax

It's been a little while since I have written an article on the Pennsylvania inheritance tax.  However, before I discuss ways to minimize the PA inheritance tax, it is important to understand that the tax rate is affected by who receives money upon your death.

As a refresher, Pennsylvania has an inheritance tax on most assets that are transferred at the time of your death if they are going to anyone besides a spouse or a charity.  There is also no inheritance tax if a child under age 21 dies and leaves their estate to their parent or step-parent.

Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax on Assets Passing to your Children, Grandchildren, Parents and Grandparents

• There is a flat 4.5% inheritance tax on most assets that pass down to your children, grandchildren, great-grand children or your other descendants.
• There is a flat 4.5% inheritance tax on most assets that pass up to your parents, grandparents or your other lineal ascendants. (Exception if the decedent is under age 21.)
• Pennsylvania treats a son-in-law or daughter-in-law as if they are a child for purposes of the inheritance tax.  As a result, there is a flat 4.5% PA inheritance tax on assets that pass to the wife or widow and husband or widower of the decedent's child. 

Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax on Assets Passing to your Brothers, Sisters, Nieces, Nephews, Friends and Others

• There is a flat 12% inheritance tax on most assets that pass to a sibling (brother or sister).  
• There is a flat 15% inheritance tax on most assets that pass up to nieces, nephews, friends and other beneficiaries. (This means there will be 15% tax on money you leave to your dog, cat or horse.)

7 Simple Ways to Minimize the Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax

1. Set up joint accounts with the people you wish to benefit.  Pennsylvania will only tax the percentage of assets owned by the decedent, not the full amount.  
• This is a particularly useful strategy if you have one child that you trust completely as only one-half of the jointly owned assets will be taxed.  However, if you have more than one child, it is possible that you and all the children are joint owners of the account, so if you have three children, only 1/4 of the account will be subject to the PA inheritance tax.
• If you have more than one child, be careful of setting up a joint account with just one person (because you may accidentally cut your other children out)
• Be sure that you don't have any concerns that your child will take your money and it won't be available for you to use.
• Transfers must occur more than one year before death to achieve the maximum tax benefit.
2. Gift your assets to your children.  This can be a very dangerous strategy, so I strongly recommend consulting with a tax attorney or accountant before making the gift.
• Dangers include giving away an asset that has a low basis resulting in a capital gains tax which could be far more expensive than simply paying the PA inheritance tax.
• If you give away too much, you could be subject to federal gift taxes or generation skipping transfer taxes.
• This could potentially cause problems if you wish to qualify for Medicaid.
3. Buy extra life insurance.  Life insurance is not subject to the Pennsylvania inheritance tax, so converting non-life insurance assets to life insurance will reduce the tax.
• An interesting planning opportunity is to by a long term care insurance policy that has a life insurance rider.  This way if you don't use up the LTC policy, it can pass tax free to your heirs.  
4. Utilize life insurance to give money to beneficiaries who are taxed at the highest tax rates.  So let's say you have total assets of $1.1 million dollars including a life insurance policy worth $100,000, and you want to leave $100,000 to your nieces and nephews and you want to leave the rest of your estate to your children.  
• If you have name your nieces and nephews the beneficiary of the life insurance and give the rest of your assets to your children, there will be a total PA inheritance tax of $45,000 (4.5% x $1M).  
• If you give the children the life insurance money, and have a will leaving your nieces and nephews $100,000 from your Will with the rest to the children, the total PA inheritance tax will be $55,500 (15% x $100,000 + 4.5% x $900,000). 
5. Buy real estate outside of Pennsylvania.  OK, maybe this isn't very simple, but Pennsylvania only taxes assets located in Pennsylvania, so a shore property in New Jersey will pass free of the PA inheritance tax.
• Beware of taxes in other states
• Don't put the real estate in an entity such as an LLC - Pennsylvania reserves the right to tax an interest in business.  (The legal theory is that you no longer own real estate, but the LLC, which is subject to a PA inheritance tax.)
6. Pay the PA inheritance tax early.  If you pay the Pennsylvania inheritance tax within 3 months from date of death, you are entitled to a 5% discount.
7. Convert your IRA to a Roth IRA.  The conversion will come at a cost to your current non-retirement assets, thereby reducing your PA taxable estate for inheritance tax purposes.
• This strategy works best when you have enough funds outside your retirement account to pay for the income taxes on the conversion.
• This strategy is especially valuable if your children are high income earners, this way they can receive distributions from the ROTH, after your death, free of income tax.
• I strongly recommend consulting with a tax attorney or accountant though before doing the conversion.  

Other Not-So-Simple Ways to Minimize the PA Inheritance Tax

1. Move to another state.  Again, this may not be simple for many people, but if you already have a property in another jurisdiction, consider whether you should change your domicile for tax purposes.  (Obviously you must actually meet the requirements of changing your domicile.)
2. Invest in farmland or a family business.  Pennsylvania exempts certain farmland and small businesses from the inheritance tax.  The problem with this may be getting your money back out of the business.
3. Setting up a GRAT or GRUT (setting up a special type of trust that creates an annuity back to you and gives excess investments to your heirs).
4. Setting up a CLAT or CLUT (setting up a special type of trust that creates an annuity to charity and leaves the rest to your heirs).
5. Setting up a CRAT or CRUT (setting up a special type of trust that creates an annuity to your heirs and leaves the rest to charity).
6. Setting up a spousal access trust.  These are typically over-funded life insurance trusts.  Money can be used for your spouse and children while your alive and then it goes completely tax free to your children.  This is a fantastic way to minimize the federal estate tax as well as minimizing the PA inheritance tax.

Simple is Never Simple

As always, be very careful that any changes you make to beneficiary designations or joint ownership of accounts could dramatically alter your overall plan.  So it never hurts to run what might seem like a simple change by an estate planning attorney.

Understanding the Differences Between Special Needs Trusts and Supplemental Needs Trusts

"Special Needs Trusts" and "Supplemental Needs Trusts" are terms to describe trusts designed to provide benefits to a person in a way that will preserve the public benefits that he or she is entitled to receive. These types of trusts are most commonly created when a person has some sort of special needs or disability.  The person who benefits from the trust is called the beneficiary.

In New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Florida, the terms "Special Needs Trusts" and "Supplemental Needs Trusts" are often used interchangeably, although they should not be as it often results in serious problems.  I personally try to use the term "Special Needs Trust" as a way to refer to a First Party Special Needs Trust (i.e. the money used to fund the trust belongs to the special needs person). I try to use the term "Supplemental Needs Trust" to refer to a Third Party Special Needs Trust (i.e. the money used to fund the trust belongs to someone other than the Special Needs Person).

Both a First Party Special Needs Trust and a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust are intended to protect different public benefits. Most disabled individuals and special needs individuals receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid, vocational rehabilitation, subsidized housing and food stamps.  The most important rule for all First Party Special Needs Trusts and Third Party Supplemental Needs Trusts is that the trust may not pay cash to the beneficiary and it may not pay to or for the benefit of the beneficiary for any medical needs covered by Medicaid, food, shelter, or any asset which could be converted into food or shelter.

A First Party Special Needs Trust and a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust allow the beneficiary to continue to receive government benefits, but also have money for clothing, education, travel, cable and cell service, electronics, furniture, personal care, medical care not covered by Medicaid, and many other items that make life worth living. 

Key features of a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust:

1.  It is a Discretionary Trust
A Discretionary Trust is a Trust that allows the trustee to give money for the benefit of the Special Needs Person as the trustee sees fit.  If the trustee has complete discretion whether to make distributions for the beneficiary, the trust principal and income will usually not be counted as available to the beneficiary for purposes of obtaining government benefits.

2.  Established using funds of someone other than the Special Needs Person
A Supplemental Needs Trust is most common when a parent, grandparent or other relative wants to leave money for the benefit of a Special Needs Person.  Care must be taken to avoid giving that person money outright, otherwise he or she risks losing public benefits.  The Supplemental Needs Trust is a way for third parties to provide a Special Needs Person access to money in a way that will not cause them to lose their benefits.

3.  No government payback upon the death of beneficiary is required
After the Special Needs beneficiary passes away, Medicaid does not require reimbursement for the funds it expended during the lifetime of the beneficiary if the trust is funded DIRECTLY with the money of someone other than the beneficiary.  Please note that if a parent leaves money to a child and then the child sets up a trust, that will be considered a First Party Special Needs Trust, and not a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust.  The key difference is that the third party must set up the trust AND fund it to qualify as a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust.

4.  A Supplemental Needs Trust can have more than one Beneficiary
While there are substantial restrictions on how the Special Needs Person can receive money, because the trust fund is not comprised of funds of the Special Needs Person, there are few guidelines on how the rest of the Supplemental Needs Trust can be administered. Accordingly, the sole benefit rule that applies to First Party Special Needs Trusts does not apply to Third Party Supplemental Needs Trusts.  As government benefits are available only to those with financial need, the most important rule is that the beneficiary should never be entitled to the money in the trust.

5.  Taxation of Third Party Supplemental Needs Trusts
A Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust can be established as a Grantor Trust while the Grantor is alive, a Qualified Disability Trust or a complex trust.  If the trust is set up as a Grantor Trust, income generated by the trust will be allocated to the Grantor (or Creator) of the Trust during his or her lifetime.   If the trust is taxed as a complex trust, the trust will pick up most of the tax consequences in these types of trusts. Designing the trust as a Qualified Disability Trust may offer a small tax break, but it offers less privacy.  Often privacy is better than saving a few dollars in taxes as it can reduce confusion by government officials looking into the benefits and income of the Special Needs Person.  When fewer people question the validity of the trust, that saves legal fees and aggravation.

Key features of a First Party Special Needs Trust:

1.  It is a Discretionary Trust
A Discretionary Trust is a Trust that allows the trustee to give money for the benefit of the special needs person as the trustee sees fit.  However, payments to any one person or entity in excess of $5,000 during a single calendar year requires government approval.

2.  Established using funds of the Special Needs Person
A First Person Special Needs Trust is most commonly created when a person inherits money outside of trust or is awarded money in a personal injury settlement.  Prior to actually receiving the money, the Special Needs Person can create this type of trust to avoid losing their public benefits.

3.  There is a government payback at the death of the Special Needs Person
After the Special Needs beneficiary passes away, the government requires that the First Party Special Needs Trust reimburse Medicaid for expenses it has incurred.  For this reason many trust specialists semi-jokingly recommend that the trustee of a First Party Special Needs Trust try to spend the last dollar of the Trust on the day the Special Needs Person dies.

4.  A First Party Special Needs Trust must be for the sole benefit of the Special Needs Person
The sole benefit rule of a Special Needs Trust is very tricky and many states, including New Jersey, have changed their definition of this term many times over the years.  For example, can payments be made for the care of a pet for a Special Needs Person?  Many New Jersey officials say no, but most will also say yes, if it is a therapy animal. The biggest issue comes up over incidental benefits.  For example, a First Party Special Needs Trust can pay for a Special Needs Person to go to an amusement park, but it shouldn't pay for the ticket of a family member caretaker even that caretaker has no interest in going to the park and is only going to assist the Special Needs Person.

5.  Establishing a First Party Special Needs Trust.
Creation of a First Party Special Needs Trusts is much more complicated than the creation of a Third Party Supplemental Needs Trust. Usually (but not always), a First Party Special Needs Trust must comply with a federal law enacted in 1993. That law requires that most First Party Special Needs Trusts be established by a judge, a court-appointed guardian or the parents or grandparents of the beneficiary with notification being given to the government so that they can appropriately monitor it.(In some cases Social Security regulations may also require a judge to sign off on the creation of trusts).  In addition, the trust must generally be created before the beneficiary turns 65 years of age.

6.  Alternate names of a First Party Special Needs Trust
First Party Special Needs Trusts are frequently referred to as d(4)(A) Trusts because that is the section of the government statute that allows for these trusts.  They are also frequently called self settled special needs trusts.

7.  Taxation of First Party Special Needs Trusts
Because this is a grantor trust for IRS tax purposes, all income earned by the trust is taxable to the Special Needs beneficiary. There is no option to tax the trust itself.  The trust is also includible in the gross estate of the Special Needs Person for estate tax purposes.  However, the trust still need its own separate EIN and must file a federal Form 1041.  (Note: This can be a very simplified form merely advising the IRS that the Grantor/beneficiary will be picking up all the taxable income on their personal income tax return.)

8.  Other Issues with First Party Special Needs Trusts
Income generated inside a properly created 1st Party Special Needs Trust should not affect the beneficiary’s eligibility for government programs.  However, while taxable income is not “countable” income for purposes of Medicaid or other government benefits, government agencies often get a “tracer” report from the IRS about the beneficiary's income, and may issue a notice that benefits will be terminated unless they receive proof that the beneficiary did not have countable income. The trustee must be prepared to explain that although the income was reportable to the IRS as the beneficiary’s income for tax purposes, the beneficiary only received "in-kind” distributions that should not be counted as income for purposes of SSI, Medicaid, or other programs.  In other words, the Trustee will likely have to explain to many different people that the Special Needs Person is being taxed on income that the beneficiary never receives.

Summary

The administration of First Party Special Needs Trusts and Third Party Supplemental Needs Trusts can be somewhat difficult. A special needs trust attorney, familiar with public benefits programs and special needs trust provisions, should always be involved in the preparation of a Special Needs Trust or a Supplemental Needs Trust. While many legal matters can be undertaken without a lawyer, or with a lawyer with a general background, special needs planning is complicated enough to require the services of a specialized practitioner.

Change to Estate Tax Exemption Limit for 2018

While the House and Senate are considering competing tax proposals, including a proposal to eliminate the federal estate tax, it is worth noting that the IRS has release Revenue Procedure 2017-58 which provides inflationary updates for a number of provisions in the Internal Revenue Code.

Assuming that the Republicans do not pass a bill that modifies the existing estate tax and gift tax structure, for 2018:

1. US Citizens and Permanent Residence Aliens can pass on $5,600,000 per person upon death or during their lifetime.  The federal estate tax exemption is also known by several other terms including the lifetime gift exemption, the basic exclusion amount, and the unified applicable exclusion amount.   The exemption is being increased by $110,000 from its 2017 limit of $5,490,000;
2. The annual gift tax exclusion will increase to $15,000 per person, per donee.  This is up from $14,000 in 2017; and
3. The annual exclusion for gifts made to a non U.S. Citizen spouse has been increased to $152,000.  This is up from $149,000 in 2017.

This revenue procedure does not change any laws.  It is simply designed to inform taxpayers of any changes in tax provisions as a result of inflation. 

Terry Pratchett's Executor Destroys Unpublished Work of Author

As a fan of the works of Author Terry Pratchett, in particular Going Postal and Making Money, I got a chuckle out of this story in the New York Times.  As some of you are aware, Terry Pratchett died in 2015.  One of his last wishes was that all of his unpublished works be destroyed by a steamroller.  A few days ago, Rob Wilkins, his estate manager posted a picture of a steamroller running over a hard drive.

Compare what Terry Pratchett did with what the Administrator of Prince's estate is doing.  Comerica Bank and Trust, as Trustee of Prince's estate, is slowly analyzing all of Prince's unpublished works and the plan is to release an album shortly to maximize the value of the estate.  Whether or not Prince would have wanted the works to be released is debatable, but because he did not leave clear instructions, an Administrator is obligating to exploit the assets as best it can so that his heirs receive the most money possible.

Remember, if you have written any books or have any other intellectual property where you wish to control of their disposition after you pass away, you must leave specific instructions for what you want done in your last Will and Testament (or other estate planning documents).  You may also name a separate executor or agent to manage your intellectual property (who may be distinct from the person managing the rest of your financial affairs).

Will the New Jersey Estate Tax Repeal Become Permanent?

As most of my estate planning clients are aware, I have been very cautious regarding whether or not New Jersey will keep a $2,000,000 estate tax exemption beyond 2017 or allow for a full repeal. However, it is worth noting that the front-runner for Governor, Phil Murphy, released part of his tax and spending plan today.  See this article on NJ.com: http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/08/murphy_tax_plan_would_raise_13_billion_heres_whod.html

As part of the plan, he stated that he has NO intentions of re-introducing the estate tax.  Accordingly, there is probably a good chance that the repeal of the NJ Estate Tax does become permanent.  Only time will tell though.

Where Is The Best Place To Die From An Estate And Inheritance Tax Perspective?

Several years ago, I wrote a few articles comparing the tax consequences of dying in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Florida.  Now that New Jersey has amended its estate tax laws, I thought I should write another post for 2017.

I will write this blawg post with the following assumptions in mind:
1) Nothing is going to a surviving spouse (since no state taxes transfers to a surviving citizen spouse, this is generally not a factor).  Note, NJ still has an estate tax on transfers to a surviving NON-CITIZEN spouse if the transfer is for more than the state estate tax exemption amount, currently $2,000,000.
2) Nothing is going to anyone other than lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, etc.)  Transfers to nieces, nephews, friends, etc. can lead to a significant inheritance tax in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, so that is really a different comparison.
3) Since different states have different rules regarding what types of assets are taxable and where they are located, I will presume that all assets described herein are taxable by your state of domicile at the time of death.
4) The tax rates computed here are approximations only.  This is particularly true because New Jersey has a well known problem with its current estate tax that needs to be addressed.  (Basically, NJ's estate tax law contains a "circular" math calculation to figure out the tax.  We are still awaiting guidance from NJ on how to best do this or if they will issue a correction making the math easier and more straightforward.)

FLORIDA
Let's start off with the easiest of the four states, Florida.  Florida does not have an estate tax. Simply put, you do not have to worry about a tax upon death.

PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania has a FLAT 4.5% inheritance tax on all transfers to children and grandchildren.  There are some notable exemptions though.  In particular, Pennsylvania does NOT have an inheritance tax on:
1) life insurance;
2) real estate or business interests owned outside of Pennsylvania;
3) a "qualified family owned business interest" - defined as having fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees, a net book value of assets less than $5 million dollars, and being in existence for at least five years at the decedent's date of death. In addition, the principal purpose of the business must not be the management of investments or income-producing assets of the entity.  Here is a short post I wrote about the inheritance taxation of small businesses in PA;
4) Most family farms; and
5) certain IRAs, 401(k) plans and 403(b) plans.  Generally, if the decedent is under 59.5 years of age and not disabled, it won't be subject to a PA inheritance tax.  The decedent must have the right to terminate or withdraw the money without penalty to avoid the PA inheritance tax.

Additionally, Pennsylvania only taxes a portion of money held in joint account with another if it has been titled in joint name for more than 1 year.

NEW YORK
New York has slowly been raising its estate tax exemption up towards the federal estate tax exemption limit.  However, NY never makes anything too easy.  For individuals dying between 4/1/16 and 3/31/17, the exemption amount is $4,187,500 and for individuals dying between 4/1/17 and 12/31/18, the exemption amount is $5,250,000.  Additionally, while NY exempts real estate located outside the state of New York from its estate tax, it also forbids deductions related to such property, which occasionally has the effect of taxing a portion of the property!

The worst part of New York's estate tax regime is that it has a substantial cliff.  Basically, if your assets are 5% higher than the exemption amount, YOU DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THE EXEMPTION!  So, currently if your estate is above $5,512,500, your pay a full tax on everything, and if you are between $5,250,000 and $5,512,500, you only receive a partial estate tax exemption.

The tax rates in New York range from 3.06% to 16% once you have over $10,100,000 of assets.

NEW JERSEY
As stated above, because of the technical problem with NJ's statute, I my calculations are based upon the assumption that New Jersey will offer a true dollar for dollar credit for its $2,000,000 exemption in 2017 (on the first $2M of assets in the name of the decedent, not the last $2M).

Moreover, it should be noted that NJ has the fewest items that it excludes from its estate tax.  It doesn't include out of state real property or business interests fully, but it does do so on a proportionate level, effectively taxing some of it once you are above the exemption amount.

New Jersey DOES have an estate tax on life insurance if you owned the policy on your own life, unless paid to a citizen spouse or charity.

New Jersey's tax rates will be 7.2% to 16% depending upon how far above the $2,000,000 exemption amount you are.

SO JUST GIVE ME THE ANSWER, WHERE IS THE LEAST EXPENSIVE PLACE TO DIE?
It's still never that easy, except for Florida.  There is never a death tax in Florida, but let's compare:

NY estate tax vs. NJ estate tax vs. FL
Starting April 1, 2017, between New Jersey, New York and Florida,  if you have assets of less than $2,000,000 and are leaving everything to your children, it does not matter.  There is no state estate tax.

If you have assets between $2,000,000 and $5,250,000, it is cheaper to die in New York and Florida as neither of those two has an estate tax.  At about $5,000,000, New Jersey will have an estate tax of close to $292,000.

As your estate approaches, $5,500,000, New York quickly becomes the most expensive place to die because of the tax cliff.

NY estate tax vs. PA inheritance tax 
Starting April 1, 2017, between Pennsylvania and New York,  if you have assets of less than $5,250,000 and are leaving everything to your children, New York is the clear winner as it does not have a death tax and Pennsylvania has a flat 4.5% tax from the first dollar.

As your estate approaches, $5,500,000, New York quickly becomes a much more expensive place to die because of the tax cliff and because the rate is so much higher.

NJ estate tax vs. PA inheritance tax 
Starting January 1, 2017, between Pennsylvania and New Jersey,  if you have assets of less than $2,000,000 and are leaving everything to your children, New Jersey is the clear winner as it does not have a death tax and Pennsylvania has a flat 4.5% tax from the first dollar.

As your estate approaches, $4,000,000, New Jersey quickly becomes a much more expensive place to die because it has a higher tax rate.

Interestingly, the last time I made these calculations, for individuals dying before 2017, the cross-over point was $1,500,000.

RECOMMENDATIONS
As always, each client has a unique situation.  Many people who have assets in excess of $4,000,000 tend to own real estate in more than one jurisdiction, further complicating the tax picture.  Also just because you have a taxable estate now, it does not mean that you should move to avoid taxes upon your death.  It is usually possible to engage in tax planning to minimize any estate and inheritance taxes.  For instance, we can assist you with gift planning to minimize taxes upon your death.  Please contact us if you would like to learn more about how the changing laws affects you.

Notification of the Death of a Loved One

New Jersey recently passed a new law that requires senior citizen housing developments to notify the next of kin in the event that a resident passes away in the development.  See http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/02/christie_signs_next-of-kin_notification_law_to_pre.html#incart_river_home

You would think that most organizations would have procedures in place for sort of thing, but it is actually a fairly common occurrence that families are not notified immediately when a loved one dies, goes to the hospital or is injured.  Accordingly, it is best for each family to make sure that if you are moving a loved one into a facility of any kind that you determine what policies and procedures the facility has in place to notify emergency contacts.

The facility should be able to recognize that when health emergencies take place, it is often important to notify a different one set of people and that if there is a death or other type of emergency, a different set of people should be notified.  Ideally, whatever facility or organization you work with can build a custom plan and contact tree that meets your needs.  

Why Titling Of Assets Is So Important In Second Marriages

I was talking to another estate planning recently and discussing how much of our work involves assisting clients who have blended families.  Blended families generally refers to clients who are married but at least one of the spouses has a child from a previous relationship.

In comparing stories and ways that we can assist clients, we discovered that the biggest hurdle that we face is with respect to titling of assets.  To understand the problem, you must realize that the following are examples of things generally trump whatever you put in your Will or Trust:

1. Life insurance beneficiary designations;
2. IRA/401k/403b and other retirement beneficiary designations;
3. Annuity beneficiary designations;
4. Owning real estate as husband and wife;
5. Owning real estate with a survivorship clause;
6. Owning real estate with a life estate;
7. Having someone on your bank account as a Pay on Death (POD) or Transfer on Death (TOD) beneficiary;
8. Owning a bank account or brokerage account jointly with someone;
9. Contractual agreements (such as a buy-sell agreement or divorce decree);
10. Joint ownership of cars and other vehicles; and
11. Joint ownership of bonds.

So, to put this another way, if you have two children from a previous relationship and are married to a new spouse, you may want 1/3 to go to each of your two children, and 1/3 to your spouse.  Well, even if you have a Will which says 1/3 goes to each person, this will not happen if some of your assets name a beneficiary or are in a joint account with someone.

Let's say in the example above Husband is the parent to 2 children and he owns the following:  A $400,000 house in New Jersey with Wife (who has no children), a $1,500,000 apartment in New York in just his name, a business worth $10,000,000 owned 70/30 with a partner, a 401k worth $3,000,000 naming his wife the beneficiary, a life insurance policy worth $1,000,000 naming his wife as a beneficiary, a brokerage account in his name worth $2,000,000 and a checking account with Wife worth $100,000.   Accordingly, the Husband has a net worth of $15,000,000.  (I'm only including $7M of the $10M business.)  It is Husband's desire to give $5M to each.

Without any additional planning and assuming that Husband and business partner have no agreement in place, a Will that leaves everything 1/3 to each child and Wife has the following consequences:

1)  The Wife would get the NJ house, the 401k, the life insurance, plus the joint checking account for a subtotal of $4,500,000.  Additionally, she would receive 1/3 of everything else (another $3,500,000) for a total of $8M.
2)  Each of the kids would receive $3,500,000 of assets - far less than what H intended.
3)  The business would be owned 23.33% by each of the children, 23.33% by the Wife and 30% by the business partner.

Unfortunately, however, life is usually even more complicated than this!  Frequently, there is a divorce agreement that might require that the life insurance be payable to the children.  Sometimes either the surviving spouse or the child is named as executor - and then the surviving spouse does not get along with the children.

Because these situations are so complex, they are very likely to result in estate litigation.  To minimize the costs of an expensive an hostile administration, it is very important to understand that title of assets frequently overrides what a Will or Trust might state and plan accordingly.

Estate Tax Thoughts on a Trump Presidency

It is no secret that most Republicans and Donald Trump wish to get rid of the federal estate tax (or as it is commonly referred to "The Death Tax").  With Republicans in charge of the House, Senate and Presidency, I think we are very likely to see a full repeal.

Many will counter that George H.W. Bush could not get a full repeal with Republicans in control of all 3 parts of the government.  I will suggest to you that those days are long gone.  There are no more moderate Republicans to push back against a full repeal, and President Trump has an incredibly personal vested interest in keeping his empire intact for his children.

There is a small chance of a filibuster against it, but I still see a strong likelihood that the federal estate tax will be gone by 2018.

NJ Estate Tax Repeal: How Does This Affect You?

It's official.  According to NJ.com, Governor Christopher Christie has signed a a bill to repeal the New Jersey Estate Tax.  The new law is part of a larger package deal that increases the gas tax, reduces the sales tax slightly, gives the working poor a larger tax credit, gives a tax cut on retirement income and gives a tax exemption for veterans who have been honorably discharged.

Under prior New Jersey law, a person may leave an unlimited amount to a spouse or charity. However, any money going to anyone else above $675,000 (the "exemption amount") is subject to an estate tax. This rule will remain in effect for the rest of 2016.  

For calendar year 2017, the estate tax exemption amount for NJ will increase to $2,000,000.  The tax rate will generally start at about 7.2% and go up to 16% on estates over $10,000,000.

There will be a full repeal of the NJ Estate Tax starting January 1, 2018.  

We have confirmed that New Jersey will NOT be repealing its inheritance tax. Accordingly, money that is left to a non-class A beneficiary will still be subject to a tax.  In other words, there will still be a tax if you leave money to anyone other than a spouse, your descendants, your ancestors or a charity upon your death.

So the big question for many might be how does this affect you.  I will break this down into 5 categories:

1) People who have prepared existing estate planning documents;
2) People with assets between $675,000 to $5,450,000 (for individuals) and married couples with assets less than $10,900,000;
3) Married couples with assets in excess of $10,900,000; 
4) Snowbirds; 
5) Widows and widowers who are the beneficiary of a credit shelter trust; and
6) People who wish to consider Medicaid planning.

1) For people who have already prepared their estate plans, most likely this will not adversely affect your plans.  However, the modification of the tax law likely gives you the opportunity to simplify your documents.  In particular, it is common practice in New Jersey to create a trust for a surviving spouse (often referred to as a Family Trust, Bypass Trust, Credit Shelter Trust or A-B Trust) to double the $675,000 exemption among spouses.  

There still may be other reasons to have a trust for a surviving spouse (such as in second marriage situations), but starting 2018, doubling the NJ exemption amount will no longer be necessary.

2) For New Jersey domiciliaries who have assets above $675,000 (the NJ estate tax exemption limit in 2016) and below the federal estate tax exemption limit ($5,450,000 for individuals and $10,900,000 for married couples in 2016), it was a common part of estate planning for a person to make deathbed gifts to minimize the NJ estate tax liability.  Once the NJ estate tax gets repealed, it will generally be much more beneficial for a person to keep all of their assets until their death rather making substantial gifts during lifetime.

Until 2018, deathbed gifting can be very tax efficient because New Jersey has an estate tax but it does not have a gift tax.  Accordingly, there is the opportunity to substantially minimize the estate tax.  The problem however, is that many people make the mistake of gifting substantially appreciated assets such as stock or real estate. You often want to keep appreciated assets until death to obtain a step-up in basis.   

So before you make a gift, you would need to weigh the potential NJ estate tax consequence of keeping an asset versus the potential capital gains tax if an asset is sold after the gift is made.

Now with the repeal of the NJ estate tax, unless a person is likely to die prior to 2018, you don't need to worry about making the calculation as to whether the NJ estate tax or the capital gains tax will be higher.  It will almost always be better to keep the asset.

3) For married couples with assets in excess of the federal estate tax exemption amount, I have read a number of studies that indicate that a couple can usually transfer wealth in a more tax efficient manner by establishing a credit shelter trust for the surviving spouse rather than relying on portability.  

There are few reasons why wealthier clients may want to continue to use traditional credit shelter trust planning.  The first is that while the estate tax exemption is portable, the generation skipping transfer tax (GST Tax) is NOT portable to a surviving spouse.  Many wealthy clients often wish to make sure the money goes not just to their children, but also to more remote descendants.

Another benefit to traditional credit shelter trust planning is that it acts as freeze for the assets inside the trust.  Specifically, let's assume that we have a married couple with exactly $10,900,000.  If we put half of those assets in trust on the first to die, then regardless of how much that goes up or down, it passes tax free on the surviving spouse's death.  So if the value of the trust goes up at faster rate than the inflation adjustment on the exemption amount, the beneficiaries are basically saving about $0.23 on the dollar because the estate tax is a 40% tax and the capital gains on the appreciation is only taxed at 23%.

While none of this planning will be different after the NJ Estate gets repealed compared to now, it makes the planning much easier to justify because right now we have a dilemma as to "HOW MUCH" we fund the credit shelter trust with.  To avoid any tax on the first to die, a credit shelter trust can only be funded with $675,000.  For some, this hardly makes it worth setting up. However, as the estate tax in NJ goes away, we no longer have this concern.

4) For snowbirds and other people who wish to avoid a "death tax", very simply, starting 2018 the tax incentive to move will be dramatically reduced.  Back in 2009, I wrote a post discussing the tax benefit of relocating to Florida.  Once the NJ estate tax gets repealed, for many it will make little difference from a tax perspective where their domicile is.

That being said, there are still significant differences between being domiciled in New Jersey vs. Florida.  After all, if you own real estate in both places, you still will need to pay property tax in both locations.  The biggest differences that people should be aware of are:

• Florida does not have a state income tax, whereas NJ does.  (Note NJ will start exempting a substantial portion of retirement income from the state income tax); 
• Florida property has homestead protection only if you are a domiciliary of Florida.  This can provide asset protection and it usually stops the property tax from increasing; and
• NJ is keeping its inheritance tax.  So if you plan to leave your assets to nieces, nephews, friends or other non-class A beneficiaries, there could be a substantial tax savings upon your death.

5) If you have a husband or wife who passed away leaving money to you in trust, come 2018 it may be beneficial to consider options for terminating the trust.  Imagine a scenario where husband dies in in 2004 leaving $675,000 in a credit shelter trust (often called a Family Trust or Bypass Trust) for his surviving spouse.  It is likely that these assets in trust have appreciated to over $1,000,000.  If these assets stay in trust until the surviving spouse's death, it will not receive another step-up in basis.  However, if the trust is terminated and assets are distributed to the surviving spouse after 2018, it could be very beneficial from a tax perspective.  

There are many caveats to this plan.  First, you would not want to terminate the trust if the first spouse to die wanted to protect the money in trust for his/her surviving children - so you would not want to terminate the trust in second marriage situations.  Second, you may not want to terminate the trust if the surviving spouse has substantial assets or debts.  It may also not be beneficial to terminate a trust if the value of the trust assets have gone down in value.  

Nevertheless, it would be advisable to consider terminating a trust to make life easier for the surviving spouse and avoid the hassle of having to file an extra income tax return for the trust. 

Please note that a trust can only be terminated if the trust allows it, so you should have the trust looked at to see if the document allows the trust to be terminated.  If the trust does not allow for termination, consider whether it should be modified under the New Jersey Uniform Trust Act.

6) While I don't do Medicaid planning, I do engage in tax planning, and tax planning just got much easier.  The problem with Medicaid planning is that there is so much bad information out in the public sphere.  

I frequently get clients with millions of dollars who want to do Medicaid planning.  They don't realize that to do this type of planning, they actually need to give away most of their assets.  This might work well with someone who has a few hundred thousand dollars.  However, the more money you have, the less sense it usually makes to do this type of planning.

For example, if you have a $500,000 IRA, stock with a basis of $100,000 and worth $400,000, and a house with a basis of $50,000 and now worth $600,000, let's talk about the tax impact of most Medicaid planning.  In order to "give away" everything to qualify for Medicaid (a total of $1.5M here), the person would have to withdraw their entire IRA, causing a federal and state income tax of over $175,000.  Additionally, the transfer of the stock and real estate now would be subject to a built in capital gains of $850,000, resulting in about another $175,000 in capital gains taxes when sold.  

All told, this planning will likely cause about $350,000 in taxes.  This does not even factor in the planning fees and the loss of opportunity to grow the IRA in a tax deferred form.  At $10,000/month in a nursing home, that is about 3 years in a nursing home.  According to the non-profit Life Happens, the average stay in a nursing home is almost 2 and half years and about 70% of the population winds up spending some time in a nursing home.  A $350,000 tax could have paid for 3 years of nursing care home... and in a non-Medicaid facility.  

Prior to the change in the estate tax law, an argument could be made that the increase in income taxes was somewhat offset by a decrease in estate taxes. Until the end of 2016, with an estate of $1.5 million, there was the potential estate tax of over $60,000.  Repeal of the estate tax obviously changes the equation.  Under the new tax law, it is generally more prudent to keep assets in your name rather than giving them away ahead of time.  So while Medicaid planning can certainly be appropriate for some, the larger your estate, the less financial sense it makes to engage in this type of planning.  

The NJ Estate Tax is Repealed! Almost.

According to NJ.com, effective October 7, 2016, the New Jersey Legislature has approved a bill that will repeal the New Jersey estate tax.  We are only awaiting the signature of Governor Christopher Christie before the law is enacted, and rumor is that he has promised to sign the bill.

Under current New Jersey law, a person may leave an unlimited amount to a spouse or charity. However, any money going to anyone else above $675,000 is going to be subject to an estate tax. This rule will remain in effect for the rest of 2016.  This is known as the exemption amount.

For calendar year 2017, the exemption amount for NJ will increase to $2,000,000.  The tax rate will generally start at about 7.2% and go up to 16% on estates over $10,000,000.

There will be a full repeal of the estate tax starting January 1, 2018.  

The new law is part of a larger package deal that increases the gas tax, reduces the sales tax slightly, gives the working poor a larger tax credit, gives a tax cut on retirement income and gives a tax exemption for veterans who have been honorably discharged.

We have confirmed that New Jersey will NOT be repealing its inheritance tax. Accordingly, money that is left to a non-class A beneficiary will be subject to a tax still.  In other words, there will still be a tax if you leave money to anyone other than a spouse, your descendants, your ancestors or a charity.

Is NJ finally going to repeal the Estate Tax and the Inheritance Tax?

I tend not to get too excited about any legislation until it is actually signed, but there is a fair amount of rumbling from both Republicans and Democrats about repealing the NJ Estate Tax.  The NJ Transportation Trust fund is running out of money, and Governor Christie has refused to sign any deal to increase the tax on gasoline without a corresponding tax cut somewhere else.

According to various sources, including this article on www.nj.com, lawmakers are close to finalizing a deal to raise the gas tax by $0.23/gallon in exchange for a 4-5 year phaseout both NJ's estate tax and inheritance tax.

Part of the proposed deal would also include a reduction on income tax on retirement money for people earning less than $100,000, an increase in the tax credit for the working poor and an increase in the deduction for charitable gifting.

It is important to note that they are trying to get a deal together by the end of the month to fund the Transportation Trust Fund.   Despite support from both Republican and Democratic senate members, a Chris Christie veto is expected (presumably because he does not think it cuts enough taxes)... that's why I'll believe a deal when I see it.

Estate Planning and Divorce in New Jersey

Men and women who are contemplating a separation or divorce have unique needs. Some divorces are very friendly and you can still count on your soon-to-be ex, but in most other situations, you may find that you rethink many aspects of your life, including where you wish your assets to go should something happen and who you can trust. 

Accordingly, it is essential to update your estate planning documents.  This should be done:

1. To ensure that someone trust-worthy will be able to make medical and financial decisions for you in the event that you are incapacitated; 
2. To prevent your soon-to-be-former spouse from receiving all of your assets; and 
3. To give you as much control as legally possible over how your children or any embryos created during infertility treatments will be taken care of and provided for in the event that you pass away.

The less trust-worthy your spouse is, the more important it will be that you take action to protect yourself (and your children). To help you get safely through this time of transition, you should consider creating:   

1. A Will. If you are married and die without a Will, your spouse would generally be entitled to 100% of your estate. However, if even if you are still married you are generally permitted to leave your assets to whomever you wish if you write a Will.  Most people think that your spouse may still be entitled to a third of your estate (the “elective share” under N.J.S.A. 3B:8-1), but the statute contains many exceptions which typically allow you to completely cut out your soon to be ex. This is because the elective share statute requires that at the time of death the decedent and the surviving spouse must not have been living separate and apart in different habitations, they must still been cohabiting as spouses and not under circumstances which would have given rise to a cause of action for divorce or nullity of marriage to a decedent prior to the decedent's death.
2. An Advance Directive for Health Care/Health Care Power of Attorney. This will allow you to control who will make medical decisions for you if you are unable to make them for yourself, helping to ensure that your wishes will be achieved. For example: would you want the person you are divorcing to be able to make decisions about your medical care and whether or not to remove life support, or would you want this decision to be made by a relative or close friend?
3. A Financial Power of Attorney. This will allow your agent to use your money to pay for your medical bills, attorney fees connected to your divorce, and potentially take action to do anything else needed for your benefit. Depending on how this document is structured, it can take effect as soon as you sign it, so that a trusted friend, relative, or financial services professional can help you through this stressful period. The divorce process is a stressful one and often brings with it a slew of new responsibilities and challenges. This document can allow you to outsource emotionally-difficult tasks such as selling your marital home and managing the transition of your assets from joint to separate accounts while you focus on making the big decisions, attending court, and adjust to life as a single parent. This document can also prove invaluable if symptoms of anxiety and depression (which can often be triggered by major life events) set in and you become unable to manage your affairs. Being proactive and creating a plan for dealing with your responsibilities can help make your daily life easier and more manageable during this difficult time. 

Speaking with an estate planning attorney can help you better understand your options and create the best possible plan when preparing for challenging circumstances.  

Written by: Jessica J. Sauer, Esq. & Kevin A. Pollock, Esq., LL.M. 

Do I Need An Attorney To Prepare A Simple Will?

I occasionally get asked if it is really necessary to hire an attorney to prepare simple estate planning documents.  Usually, the answer is NO, however, I find that once I start asking a few questions, most people really don't need a simple Will and they would be much better served with professional guidance.

Let me take you through some of the questions that I ask to determine whether it is worthwhile to engage legal counsel:

1) Do you have children from a previous marriage?  If so, I strongly recommend that you hire an attorney.
2) Do you minor children?  Most likely you would benefit from professional advice.
3) Are you wealthy?  If you have less than $300,000, I would say you probably would not need an attorney. Between $300,000 - $500,000 is maybe.  Between $500,000 to $2,000,000 is probably.If you have over $2,000,000, I strongly recommend that you hire an estate planning attorney with a masters in taxation.
4) Do you wish to leave money to a person with special needs child, drug/alcohol problems, going through divorce, bad with money or might otherwise require special instructions?  If so, I strongly recommend that you hire an attorney.
5)  Are you leaving money UNEQUALLY to your children or are you cutting out one of your next of kin?  If so, I strongly recommend that you  hire an attorney.
6)  Do you have concerns that your next of kin might fight over your inheritance?   If so, I strongly recommend that you hire an attorney.
7)  Do you plan to leave more than a token amount to charity?  If so, I strongly recommend that you hire an attorney with a masters in taxation.
8)  Do you plan to leave different types of assets to different people?  (For example, a business to one child, one piece of real estate to another child, and an IRA to a third child)  If so, I strongly recommend that you hire an attorney.
9)  Do you intend to leave money to a pet?  Yes - serious question for some and if you do, I recommend using an attorney.
10) Do you own any unusual items that have value (such as artwork, intellectual property, family heirlooms)?  If so, you probably wish to hire an attorney.
11) Do you own assets in more than one jurisdiction?  If so, I recommend using an attorney.
12) Are you elderly and worried that you may need to spend significant time (over 2 years) in a nursing home?  Then you should probably meet with a Medicaid attorney.
13) Where do you live?  In some states, probate is an absolute nightmare, so even with a small amount, you might wish to hire an attorney to help you avoid probate.

So what do I consider a simple situation?  Generally it is a person who has less than $300,000 of traditional assets, has responsible adult children who all get along, and the testator wishes to leave everything outright to those children in a probate friendly state.  Most others could basically save time or money with professional advice.