Where Is The Best Place To Die From An Estate And Inheritance Tax Perspective?

Several years ago, I wrote a few articles comparing the tax consequences of dying in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Florida.  Now that New Jersey has amended its estate tax laws, I thought I should write another post for 2017.

I will write this blawg post with the following assumptions in mind:
1) Nothing is going to a surviving spouse (since no state taxes transfers to a surviving citizen spouse, this is generally not a factor).  Note, NJ still has an estate tax on transfers to a surviving NON-CITIZEN spouse if the transfer is for more than the state estate tax exemption amount, currently $2,000,000.
2) Nothing is going to anyone other than lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, etc.)  Transfers to nieces, nephews, friends, etc. can lead to a significant inheritance tax in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, so that is really a different comparison.
3) Since different states have different rules regarding what types of assets are taxable and where they are located, I will presume that all assets described herein are taxable by your state of domicile at the time of death.
4) The tax rates computed here are approximations only.  This is particularly true because New Jersey has a well known problem with its current estate tax that needs to be addressed.  (Basically, NJ's estate tax law contains a "circular" math calculation to figure out the tax.  We are still awaiting guidance from NJ on how to best do this or if they will issue a correction making the math easier and more straightforward.)

FLORIDA
Let's start off with the easiest of the four states, Florida.  Florida does not have an estate tax. Simply put, you do not have to worry about a tax upon death.

PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania has a FLAT 4.5% inheritance tax on all transfers to children and grandchildren.  There are some notable exemptions though.  In particular, Pennsylvania does NOT have an inheritance tax on:
1) life insurance;
2) real estate or business interests owned outside of Pennsylvania;
3) a "qualified family owned business interest" - defined as having fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees, a net book value of assets less than $5 million dollars, and being in existence for at least five years at the decedent's date of death. In addition, the principal purpose of the business must not be the management of investments or income-producing assets of the entity.  Here is a short post I wrote about the inheritance taxation of small businesses in PA;
4) Most family farms; and
5) certain IRAs, 401(k) plans and 403(b) plans.  Generally, if the decedent is under 59.5 years of age and not disabled, it won't be subject to a PA inheritance tax.  The decedent must have the right to terminate or withdraw the money without penalty to avoid the PA inheritance tax.

Additionally, Pennsylvania only taxes a portion of money held in joint account with another if it has been titled in joint name for more than 1 year.

NEW YORK
New York has slowly been raising its estate tax exemption up towards the federal estate tax exemption limit.  However, NY never makes anything too easy.  For individuals dying between 4/1/16 and 3/31/17, the exemption amount is $4,187,500 and for individuals dying between 4/1/17 and 12/31/18, the exemption amount is $5,250,000.  Additionally, while NY exempts real estate located outside the state of New York from its estate tax, it also forbids deductions related to such property, which occasionally has the effect of taxing a portion of the property!

The worst part of New York's estate tax regime is that it has a substantial cliff.  Basically, if your assets are 5% higher than the exemption amount, YOU DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THE EXEMPTION!  So, currently if your estate is above $5,512,500, your pay a full tax on everything, and if you are between $5,250,000 and $5,512,500, you only receive a partial estate tax exemption.

The tax rates in New York range from 3.06% to 16% once you have over $10,100,000 of assets.

NEW JERSEY
As stated above, because of the technical problem with NJ's statute, I my calculations are based upon the assumption that New Jersey will offer a true dollar for dollar credit for its $2,000,000 exemption in 2017 (on the first $2M of assets in the name of the decedent, not the last $2M).

Moreover, it should be noted that NJ has the fewest items that it excludes from its estate tax.  It doesn't include out of state real property or business interests fully, but it does do so on a proportionate level, effectively taxing some of it once you are above the exemption amount.

New Jersey DOES have an estate tax on life insurance if you owned the policy on your own life, unless paid to a citizen spouse or charity.

New Jersey's tax rates will be 7.2% to 16% depending upon how far above the $2,000,000 exemption amount you are.

SO JUST GIVE ME THE ANSWER, WHERE IS THE LEAST EXPENSIVE PLACE TO DIE?
It's still never that easy, except for Florida.  There is never a death tax in Florida, but let's compare:

NY estate tax vs. NJ estate tax vs. FL
Starting April 1, 2017, between New Jersey, New York and Florida,  if you have assets of less than $2,000,000 and are leaving everything to your children, it does not matter.  There is no state estate tax.

If you have assets between $2,000,000 and $5,250,000, it is cheaper to die in New York and Florida as neither of those two has an estate tax.  At about $5,000,000, New Jersey will have an estate tax of close to $292,000.

As your estate approaches, $5,500,000, New York quickly becomes the most expensive place to die because of the tax cliff.

NY estate tax vs. PA inheritance tax 
Starting April 1, 2017, between Pennsylvania and New York,  if you have assets of less than $5,250,000 and are leaving everything to your children, New York is the clear winner as it does not have a death tax and Pennsylvania has a flat 4.5% tax from the first dollar.

As your estate approaches, $5,500,000, New York quickly becomes a much more expensive place to die because of the tax cliff and because the rate is so much higher.

NJ estate tax vs. PA inheritance tax 
Starting January 1, 2017, between Pennsylvania and New Jersey,  if you have assets of less than $2,000,000 and are leaving everything to your children, New Jersey is the clear winner as it does not have a death tax and Pennsylvania has a flat 4.5% tax from the first dollar.

As your estate approaches, $4,000,000, New Jersey quickly becomes a much more expensive place to die because it has a higher tax rate.

Interestingly, the last time I made these calculations, for individuals dying before 2017, the cross-over point was $1,500,000.

RECOMMENDATIONS
As always, each client has a unique situation.  Many people who have assets in excess of $4,000,000 tend to own real estate in more than one jurisdiction, further complicating the tax picture.  Also just because you have a taxable estate now, it does not mean that you should move to avoid taxes upon your death.  It is usually possible to engage in tax planning to minimize any estate and inheritance taxes.  For instance, we can assist you with gift planning to minimize taxes upon your death.  Please contact us if you would like to learn more about how the changing laws affects you.

Reasons to Value a Trust

Recently I gave a lecture on the valuation of trusts.  While I am not an accountant nor am I a valuation expert, I live and breathe trusts... and frequently the question comes up, what is value of a particular beneficiary's interest in a trust.

Keep in mind, just because a trust is worth $1M, it does not mean that the beneficiary's interest is worth $1M if they have limited rights to invade the trust or control it.  Here's are a few reasons to value a trust:

1. When a person dies, that person may have a beneficial interest in a trust.  Depending upon the type of interest a person has, it may or may not be includible in his/her taxable estate.  If the interest is includible in the deceased beneficiary's taxable estate, then the executor of the deceased beneficiary must report it on federal and state estate tax returns. 
2. Similar to the above, but slightly different, when a person dies, he or she may leave a beneficial interest in a trust to another person.  Particularly in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, you see this come up a lot when a person leaves money to a class A beneficiary in trust (such as a spouse), and then the remainder interest to an non class A beneficiary (such as a nephew or niece).  This triggers something known as the Compromise tax.
3. Financial Aid - Some colleges and schools will look at the trust terms, others won't.  Each school is different regarding the questions they ask on their forms.
4. Divorce.  Depending upon the state, a person's interest may be subject to equitable distribution, alimony and especially child support.  

• New Jersey tends to be fairly friendly to a trust beneficiary.  See Tannen vs. Tannen, where the Appellate Court ruled that a beneficiary's income interest should not be imputed for purposes of alimony.  The general rule was already that such an interest was not subject to equitable distribution.  (NOTE:  This case law is likely to be challenged in light of the fact that NJ recently enacted the Uniform Trust Act. 
• Pennsylvania is far less friendly to trust beneficiaries.  The general rule in Pennsylvania is that marital property does not include trust property acquired by gift, bequest, devise or descent prior to or during the marriage, but it does include the increase in value of such property. See 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. 3501(a.1)   
• As far as I am aware, both Florida and New York follow the NJ rule and generally considers trust property as separate property, not subject to equitable distribution.  
• Massachusetts recently came down with a terrible case:  See Pfannenstiehl.   (Note: I'm not licensed in MA)

Regardless of the reason why you need to value a trust, the first step in determining the value is to figure out what type of interest that person has.  Usually a beneficiary's interest includes one or more of the following:

• An income stream
• The right to receive income or principal for health, education, maintenance and support
• An annuity stream (such as $2000/month)
• Principal distributions once the beneficiary reaches a certain age
• The right to take out $5000 or 5% per year
• A discretionary interest

Once you have figured out a person's interest in a trust, the next step usually involves hiring a certified appraiser to figure out the value of a person's interest. A trust attorney can assist the appraiser by advising them on the nuances of the trust and not-so-obvious options that a person may have in invading a trust.  

If you are the beneficiary of a large trust, I would recommend that you have the trust reviewed to see if you should disclaim and renounce certain powers to minimize taxes upon your death.  

Non Residents of Pennsylvania Can Be Subject to Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax

I frequently get calls from individuals who had a relative pass away with property located in Pennsylvania. Even though the decedent lived somewhere besides Pennsylvania, you should be aware that Pennsylvania reserves the right to tax this property on the death of the owner via an inheritance tax.

This tax will apply whether the decedent owned the property outright or in a revocable trust. Moreover, it does not matter where the beneficiaries live.  However, the tax rate for the PA inheritance tax is based upon who receives the property.  So, there will not be a tax if the property is left to a surviving spouse or a charity, but there will be a 4.5% tax if it is left to children.

There are ways to minimize or avoid this tax completely, but often it can come at the cost of paying more in capital gains tax.  If you are a non-resident owner of Pennsylvania real estate, I strongly suggest you meet with an estate planning attorney on how to minimize the taxes on your death.

Japanese Inheritance Tax vs. US Estate Tax (2014 Update)

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF
JAPANESE INHERITANCE AND GIFT TAXES
vs.
AMERICAN ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES

(2014 Update)

I. Estate Taxes

A. America

1. If the Decedent is a Citizen or Permanent Resident

a. Tax on Worldwide property (credit for taxes paid to foreign countries)

b. Exemption of $5,340,000 in 2014 (indexed for inflation). For married couples, the exemption amount is $10,680,000 as a result of portability.

c. Federal Estate Tax of 40% on amount over $5,340,000

d. Unlimited Marital Deduction for Surviving Spouse if Surviving Spouse is a citizen

2. If the Decedent is a Non-Citizen/Non-Permanent Resident

a. Tax only on Real Property and business interests in the United States (Cash in foreign banks and foreign stocks are not taxed)

b. Exemption of $60,000 for US based Assets

c. Tax of between 18%-40% on amount over $60,000

d. Unlimited Marital deduction if Surviving Spouse a citizen
e. Tax on bequest to surviving spouse can be delayed by creating a Qualified Domestic Trust

3. If the Decedent is not a United States Citizen or permanent resident alien, assets outside of the US can pass to a US person with no US estate tax.

B. Japan (Actually an Inheritance tax, not an estate tax)

1. Japanese Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Tax on Worldwide property (credit for taxes paid to foreign countries) - [NOTE - this is new for 2013, previously Japan did not tax worldwide assets] 
b.  Exemption of ¥30,000,000 + (¥6,000,000 for each statutory heir); Possible additional exemption for insurance money, retirement savings, and money left to handicapped individuals [NOTE - this is a reduction from the previous exemption of ¥50,000,000 and ¥10,000,000 per statutory heir.]

c. Additional exemption for life insurance received of ¥5,000,000 multiplied by the number of statutory heirs

c. Until December 31, the highest tax rate is 50%.  Effective January 1, 2015, tax between 10%-55% for statutory heirs (spouse, children and parents) after you go over the exemption amount;

• Up to ¥10 million 10%
• Above ¥10 million up to ¥30 million 15%
• Above ¥30 million up to ¥50 million 20%
• Above ¥50 million up to ¥100 million 30%
• Above ¥100 million up to ¥200 million 40%
• Above ¥200 million up to ¥300 million 45%
• Above ¥300 million up to ¥600 million 50%
• Over ¥600 million 55% 

d. An additional 20% surcharge for everyone other else other than charities (this does include a surcharge on gifts to grandchildren);

e. For property outside of Japan, a beneficiary that acquires property will be subject to Japanese inheritance tax. (THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE, prior to April 1, 2013, Japan did not tax gifts or inheritance of property outside of Japan received by non-Japanese nationals.)

f. A surviving spouse is entitled to a tax deduction. This is a complex formula based upon who is living at the time of the Decedent's death and where the money goes. Generally, a surviving spouse can deduct about 1/2 to 2/3 of the tax.

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. If beneficiary is not Japanese and not living in Japan and property is not in Japan, appears Country where property located will tax such property.
b. I'm currently double checking to see if the Beneficiary is a Japanese Domiciliary whether Japan CAN tax inheritance regardless of where Decedent lived and regardless of where assets are located (subject to tax treaties)

c. If there is a tax, it appears a surviving spouse is entitled to the same marital tax deduction as for Japanese citizens.

3. Real estate acquisition tax is exempt if passing by bequest.  There is a registration and license tax at the rate of 0.4% of the assessed value of the land and building. (currently reduced?)

II. Gift Taxes

A. America

1. Citizens and Permanent Residents

a. Tax on all gift transfers of Worldwide property

b. Annual exemption of $14,000 per person/per donee (unlimited gifts for donees if different donors)

c. An annual gift to a non-citizen, permanent resident spouse, of $145,000 is available.

d. Lifetime exemption of $5,340,000

e. Gifts may be split with spouse

f. Tax rate of 40% if lifetime gifts exceed $5,340,000

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. Tax on all gift transfers of US Property (including real estate and Stocks in US companies)

b. Annual exemption of $14,000 per person/per donee (unlimited gifts for donees if different donors)

c. Annual gift tax exemption if gift to a spouse of $145,000 (Note that a person can gift more to a spouse than they can bequest to a spouse)

c. No Lifetime exemption

d. Gifts may not be split with spouse

e. Tax rate of 18%-40% if gifts exceed $14,000

B. Japan (Rates between 10%-55%)

1. Citizens and Permanent Residents of Japan

a. Tax on gifts of property Worldwide (credit for taxes paid to foreign countries) - [NOTE - this is new for 2013, previously Japan did not tax gifts worldwide assets to certain people] 

a. Annual exemption of ¥1,100,000 for each beneficiary (beneficiary taxed after this)

b. One time spouse exemption of ¥20,000,000

c. Effective January 1, 2015, tax between 10%-55% for statutory heirs (spouse, children and parents) after you go over the exemption amount;

• Up to ¥2 million 10%
• Above ¥2 million up to ¥4 million 15%
• Above ¥4 million up to ¥6 million 20%
• Above ¥6 million up to ¥10 million 30%
• Above ¥10 million up to ¥15 million 40%
• Above ¥15 million up to ¥30 million 45%
• Above ¥30 million up to ¥45 million 50%
• Over ¥45 million 55% 
• The threshold is lower for gifts to other individuals.

d. For property outside of Japan, a donee that acquires property will be subject to Japanese gift tax.  (THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE, prior to April 1, 2013, Japan did not tax gifts or inheritance of property outside of Japan received by non-Japanese national.)

2. Non-Citizens/Non-Permanent Residents

a. Annual exemption of ¥1,100,000 for each beneficiary(unclear – enforcement is almost impossible)
b. Japan will tax donees who live in Japan.

3. Special real estate acquisition tax of 4% (currently reduced?) in addition to a registration and license tax at the rate of 2% of the assessed value of the land and building.

III. Generation Skipping Taxes (Taxes on gifts or bequests to grandchildren or lower generations)

A. America

1. Exemption of $5,340,000 (indexed for inflation)
2. Tax of 40% on rest

B. Japan

1. None

Remember, there is an estate and inheritance treaty between the United States and Japan to minimize double taxation of assets on death if you own assets in both countries or are a resident of one living in the other country

For more information on Japanese taxes, the Japanese government has a website in English with some helpful facts, but it is now very outdated. 

I am not licensed to practice in Japan, this is just my understanding of Japanese gift and inheritance tax law that I can gather from sources which are written in English.

NOTE- Major rewrite on 9/12/14 to address changes in rates and fact that assets outside of Japan are now subject to Japanese inheritance and gift tax.

Pennsylvania Same Sex Married Couples No Longer Have to Pay Inheritance Tax

On May 20, 2014, U.S. District Court Judge John Jones III declared that Pennsylvania's laws banning same sex marriage was unconstitutional.  Besides the practical implication that same sex couples in Pennsylvania may now get married, it also means that when one spouse dies, the survivor can now inherit tax free.  

Previously, only a heterosexual surviving spouse could inherit assets of the deceased spouse tax free.  Additionally, for same sex couples, if one partner left money to another, that would be taxed at a 15% rate - the same as if the person were a total stranger.

If you are in a same sex marriage (that was licensed in another state) you may wish to consider revising your estate planning documents as a result of this ruling.  Additionally, if you have recently lost a same sex spouse, you may wish to consider amending the Pennsylvania inheritance tax return to request a refund.   

Excellent Guide on International Estate and Inheritance Taxes

While I have not had a chance to review it thoroughly to confirm its accuracy, I note that the accounting firm, Ernst & Young, has posted a detailed analysis of the estate and inheritance tax laws of almost every country in this brochure.

For those of you who have assets in multiple jurisdictions or are citizens living abroad, you should familiarize yourselves with these laws and hire competent counsel to asset you in minimizing your taxes.

Choosing an Executor, Trustee and Guardian

Clients frequently ask me for advice on who they should name as Executor, Trustee or Guardian when creating their Last Will and Testament.  First, let me explain the difference between the three roles.

The Executor is the person who probates your Will, goes into your house and looks through all your things, safeguards your assets, gathers up your money, pays your bills, files any income tax, estate tax or inheritance tax returns that need to be filed, and then distributes the balance of your money according to the instructions in your Will.  One or more individuals or corporate fiduciaries can serve as Executor.

The Trustee is the person who takes the assets that the Executor (or Grantor) gives him, invests the money in a prudent fashion, and distributes the money to the beneficiary of the trust in accordance with its terms.  One or more individuals or corporate fiduciaries can serve as Trustee. 

The Guardian is the person who will raise your minor children until they are 18 (or longer for an incapicitated individual). 

The three main qualities that you want to look for in an Executor and Trustee are:

1. Someone that is trustworthy and won't steal the money;
2. Someone that will not be overwhelmed by the role, there is a lot of work involved; and
3. Someone that does not have a bad relationship with the beneficiaries and will be able to communicate with them.

You will notice that I did not say that the exeuctor or trustee must be good at investing money.  That is because I believe the other characteristics are much more important.  An honest person who is diligent can always hire an investment manager. They just need to keep an eye on the investment manager.

The three main qualities that you want to look for in a Guardian are:

1. Someone that will love and care for your children;
2. Someone that will raise your children in a manner that you wish (including religion, education, diet, etc.); and
3. Someone that will have a stable family household.

Frequently, clients will name one party as executor or trustee and another person as guardian.  Sometimes this can be a good idea as the two parties can then monitor each other.  Additionally, this is a way to get two parts of the family to interact.  However, if there is someone that you truly trust to serve in all three roles, it is usually best to name them and not divide the roles just for the sake of dividing the roles.

For all of these positions, age may be a factor as well as you may not want to name someone too young or too old.  It is a heavy burden to put on people.  I never, ever recommend naming people just so they won't feel excluded. 

Finally, an attorney can serve as an Executor or Trustee, but you can name whomever you wish.

Pennsylvania Makes Significant Changes to Inheritance Tax Law

On July 9, 2013, Pennsylvania enacted new legislation that made significant changes to their inheritance tax law by exempting the transfer of small family owned businesses. (H.B. 465)  A qualified family-owned business is defined as a proprietorship or entity with fewer than 50 full time employees and assets less than $5,000,000 at the decedent's death.  The decedent and the decedent's family must own 100% of the business at the time of the decedent's death, be an active business (not just the management of investments or income-producing assets), and have been in existence for five years prior to the decedent's date of death.

The decedent must transfer the business to one or more qualified transferees, which include a spouse, lineal descendants, siblings, lineal descendants of a sibling, ancestors or a siblings of an ancestor.  Lineal descendants most likely includes stepdecedendants as well as adopted children. 

It is very important to note that the business must be held by the qualified transferee for seven years, or you will lose the exemption.  Accordingly, the Pennsylvania Division of Revenue will require that the transferee submit a form for each of those seven years to maintain the exemption.

This is the second time that Pennsylvania has changed its inheritance tax laws in the last two years as it most recently eliminated the tax of many family farms.  Both of these laws are designed to allow families to keep small businesses and farms without having to sell them off to pay the tax.  They are also designed to help people keep their jobs.

I will note that the law also makes dramatic changes to other tax laws, including requiring owners of out of state entities to report their Pennsylvania source income.

United States - Japan Estate, Inheritance & Gift Tax Treaty

My links to this have expired and it always takes me forever to find the treaty, so I'm going to reprint the whole thing here.  Hopefully it is accurate:

JAPAN ESTATE AND GIFT TAX TREATY

UNITED STATES- JAPAN ESTATE, INHERITANCE, AND GIFT TAX TREATY

[Signed 4/16/54]


ARTICLE I

(1) The taxes referred to in the present convention are:

  (a) In the case of the United States of America: The Federal estate and gift taxes.

  (b) In the case of Japan: The inheritance tax (including the gift tax).

(2) The present convention shall also apply to any other tax on estates, inheritances or gifts which has a character substantially similar to those referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article and which may be imposed by either contacting State after the date of signature of the present convention.


ARTICLE II

(1) As used in the present convention:

  (a) The term "United States" means the United States of America, and when used in a geographical sense means the States, the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii, and the District of Columbia.

  (b) The term " Japan", when used in a geographical sense, means all the territory in which the laws relating to the tax referred to in paragraph (1)(b) of Article I are enforced.

  (c) The term "tax" means those taxes referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) of Article I, as the context requires.

  (d) The term "competent authorities" means, in the case of the United States, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury; and, in the case of Japan, the Minister of Finance or his authorized representative.

(2) In the application of the provisions of the present convention by either contracting State any term not otherwise defined shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the meaning which such term has under the laws of such State relating to the tax.

(3) For the purpose of the present convention, each contracting State may determine in accordance with its laws whether a decedent at the time of his death or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate at the
time of such decedent's death, or a donor at the time of the gift or a beneficiary of a gift at the time of the gift, was domiciled therein or a national thereof.


Article III

(1) If a decedent at the time of his death or a donor at the time of the gift was a national of or domiciled in the United States, or if a beneficiary of a decedent's estate at the time of such decedent's death or a beneficiary of a gift at the time of the gift was domiciled in Japan, the situs at the time of the transfer of any of the following property or property rights shall, for the purpose of the imposition of the tax and for the purpose of the credit authorized by Article V, be determined exclusively in accordance with the following rules:

  (a) Immovable property or rights therein (not including any property for which specific provision is otherwise made in this Article) shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the land involved is
located.

  (b) Tangible movable property (including currency and any other form of money recognized as legal tender in the place of issue and excepting such property for which specific provision is otherwise made in this Article) shall be deemed to be situated at the place where such property is physically located, or, if in [transit], at the place of destination.

  (c) Debts (including bonds, promissory notes, bills of exchange, bank deposits and insurance, except bonds or other negotiable instruments in bearer form and such debts for which specific provision
is otherwise made in this Article) shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the debtor resides.

  (d) Shares or stock in a corporation shall be deemed to be situated at the place under the laws of which such corporation was created or organized.

  (e) Ships and aircraft shall be deemed to be situated at the place where they are registered.

  (f) Goodwill as a trade, business or professional asset shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on.

  (g) Patents, trade-marks, utility models and designs shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on.

  (h) Copyrights, franchises, rights to artistic and scientific works and rights or licenses to use any copyrighted material, artistic and scientific works, patents, trade-marks, utility models or designs shall be deemed to be situated at the place where they are exercisable.

  (i) Mining or quarrying rights or mining leases shall be deemed to be situated at the place of such mining or quarrying.

  (j) Fishing rights shall be deemed to be situated in the country in whose government's jurisdiction such rights are exercisable.

  (k) Any property for which provision is not hereinbefore made shall be deemed to be situated in accordance with the laws of the contracting State imposing the tax solely by reason of the situs of property within such State, but if neither of the contracting States imposes the tax solely by reason of the situs of property therein, then any such property shall be deemed to be situated in accordance with the laws of each contracting State.


(2) The application of the provisions of paragraph (1) of this Article shall be limited to the particular property, and any portion thereof, which without such provisions would be subjected to the taxes
of both contracting States or would be so subjected except for a specific exemption.


ARTICLE IV

Where one of the contracting States imposes the tax solely by reason of the situs of property within such State, in the case of a decedent who at the time of his death, or of a donor who at the time of
the gift, was a national of or domiciled in the United States, or in the case of a beneficiary of a decedent's estate who at the time of such decedent's death, or a beneficiary of a gift who at the time of the gift, was domiciled in Japan, the contracting State so imposing the tax:

  (a) shall allow a specific exemption which would be applicable under its laws if the decedent donor, or beneficiary, as the case may be, had been a national of or domiciled in such State, in an amount not
less than the proportion thereof which (A) the value of the property, situated according to Article III in such State and subjected to the taxes of both contracting States or which would be so subjected except for a specific exemption, bears to (B) the value of the total property which would be subjected to the tax of such State if such decedent, donor, or beneficiary had been a national of or domiciled in such State;  and

  (b) shall (except for the purpose of subparagraph (a) of this paragraph and for the purpose of any other proportional allowance otherwise provided) take no account of property situated according to
Article III outside such State in determining the amount of the tax.


ARTICLE V

(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shall
allow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes of both States (but the amount of the credit shall not exceed that portion of the tax imposed by the crediting State which is attributable to such property). The provisions of this
paragraph shall not apply with respect to any property referred to in paragraph (2) of this Article.

(2) Where each contracting State imposes the tax by reasons of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary, with respect to any property situated at the time of the transfer outside both contracting States (or deemed by each contracting State to be situated in its territory, or deemed by one contracting State to be situated in either contracting State and deemed by the other contracting State to be situated outside both contracting States or deemed by each contracting State to be situated in the other contracting State), each contracting State shall allow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for a part of the tax
imposed by the other contracting State attributable to such property.
  The total of the credits authorized by this paragraph shall be equal to the amount of the tax imposed with respect to such property by the contracting State imposing the smaller amount of the tax with respect to such property, and shall be divided between both contracting States in
proportion to the amount of the tax imposed by each contracting State with respect to such property.

(3) The credit authorized by this Article, if applicable, shall be in lieu of any credit for the same tax authorized by the laws of the crediting State, the credit applicable for the particular tax being
either credit authorized by this Article or credit authorized by such laws, whichever is the greater. For the purposes of this Article, the amount of the tax of each contracting State attributable to any
designated property shall be ascertained after taking into account any applicable diminution or credit against its tax with respect to such property (other than any credit under paragraph (1) or (2) of this
Article), provided, however, in case another credit for the tax of any other foreign State is allowable with respect to the same property pursuant to any other convention between the crediting State under the present convention and such other foreign State, or pursuant to the laws of the crediting State, the total of such credits shall not exceed the amount of tax of the crediting State attributable to such property computed before allowance of such credits.

(4) Credit against the tax of one of the contracting States for the tax of the other contracting State shall be allowed under this Article only where both such taxes have been simultaneously imposed at the time of a decedent's death or at the time of a gift.

(5) No credit resulting from the application of this Article shall be allowed after more than five years from the due date of the tax against which credit would otherwise be allowed, unless claim therefor
was filed within such five-year period. Any refund resulting from the application of this Article shall be made without payment of interest on the amount so refunded, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the crediting State.

(6) Credit against the tax of one of the contracting States shall not be finally allowed for the tax of the other contracting State until the latter tax (reduced by credit authorized under this Article, if any)
has been paid.


ARTICLE VI

(1) The competent authorities of both contracting States shall exchange such information available under the respective tax laws of both contracting States as is necessary for carrying out the provisions
of the present convention or for the prevention of fraud or for the administration of statutory provisions against tax avoidance in relation to the tax. Any information so exchanged shall be treated as secret and shall not be disclosed to any person other than those, including a court, concerned with the assessment and collection of the tax or the determination of appeals in relation thereto. No information shall be exchanged which would disclose any trade, business, industrial or professional secret or any trade process.

(2) Each of the contracting States may collect the tax imposed by the other contracting State (as though such tax were the tax of the former State) as will ensure that the credit or any other benefit
granted under the present convention by such other State shall not be enjoyed by persons not entitled to such benefits.


ARTICLE VII

Where representative of the estate of a decedent or a beneficiary of such estate or a donor or a beneficiary of a gift shows proof that the action of the tax authorities of either contracting State has
resulted, or will result, in double taxation contrary to the provisions of the present convention, such representative, donor or beneficiary shall be entitled to present the facts to the competent authorities of the contracting State of which the decedent was a national at the time of his death or of which the donor or beneficiary is a national, or if the decedent was not a national of either of the contracting States at the time of his death or if the donor or the beneficiary is not a national of either of the contracting States, to the competent authorities of the contracting State in which the decedent was domiciled or resident at the time of his death or in which the donor or beneficiary is domiciled or resident. Should the claim be deemed worthy of consideration, the competent authorities of such State to which the facts are so presented shall undertake to come to an agreement with the
competent authorities of the other contracting State with a view to equitable avoidance of the double taxation in question.


ARTICLE VIII

(1) The provisions of the present convention shall not be construed to deny or affect in any manner the right of diplomatic and consular officers to other or additional exemptions now enjoyed or which may hereafter be granted to such officers.

(2) The provisions of the present convention shall not be construed so as to increase the tax imposed be either contracting State.

(3) Should any difficulty or doubt arise as to the interpretation or application of the present convention, or its relationship to conventions between one of the contracting States and any other State, the competent authorities of the contracting States may settle the question by mutual agreement; it being understood, however, that this provision shall not be construed to preclude the contracting States from settling by negotiation any dispute arising under the present convention.

(4) The competent authorities of both contracting States may prescribe regulations necessary to interpret and carry out the provisions of the present convention and may communicate with each other directly for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of the present convention.


ARTICLE IX

(1) The present convention shall be ratified and the instruments of ratification shall be exchanged at Tokyo as soon as possible.

(2) The present convention shall enter into force on the date of exchange of instruments of ratification and shall be applicable to estates or inheritances in the case of persons who die on or after the
date of such exchange and to gifts made on or after that date.

(3) Either of the contracting States may terminate the present convention at any time after a period of five years shall have expired from the date on which the convention enters into force, by giving to
the other contracting State notice of termination, provided that such notice is given on or before the 30th day of June and, in such event the present convention shall cease to be effective for the taxable years beginning on or after the first day of January of the calendar year next following that in which such notice is given.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed the present convention.

DONE at Washington, in duplicate, in the English and Japanese languages, each text having equal authenticity, this sixteenth day of April, 1954.

FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

WALTER BEDELL SMITH


FOR JAPAN:

S. IGUCHI

Probate In New Jersey - When There Is A Will

One of the questions I frequently get is: What is involved with probate in New Jersey?

In some jurisdictions, I know attorneys go out of their way to help their clients avoid the probate process by creating trusts and titling assets so that they can be transferred automatically on death.  In New Jersey, probate usually is not that costly or difficult - at least compared to places like California, New York, Pennsylvania and Florida.

Part of the reason for this is that New Jersey requires attorneys to charge a reasonable fee, and not a percentage of the estate.  Additionally, the New Jersey does not charge much for filing a Will or for any other administration fees.  Moreover, in almost every county that I've had to deal with, the local Surrogate has been tremendously helpful in trying to assist us through the process.  I know I frequently call the Mercer County Surrogate's Office, which is a wealth of information.

So, going back to what is involved, each estate is highly unique.  However, here are some good steps to take:

1)  Deal with the family and make funeral arrangements.  An executor does not have to pay for the funeral.  Whoever pays can be reimbursed by the Estate later on.

2)  Identify valuable assets and the Will and secure them for safe keeping.  (This may include searching the house and possibly even changing locks if you think that someone may access the property unlawfully.)

3)  Identify the decedent's next of kin and obtain contact information for them.  You will need this when applying to be executor.

4)  After the Original Will has been found, identify who the Executor is. If the Executor is not alive or not willing to serve, steps must be taken so that a backup can be named.  If the Original Will cannot be found, there is a process for a having a copy approved by the Court.

5)  Take the Will to the Surrogate in the County where the Decedent resided.  Be aware that no Will can be probated in New Jersey until ten (10) days have passed since the Testator has died.  An Executor can go down to the Surrogate with all the paperwork within the first ten days, but the Letters Testamentary won't be released until that time frame has expired.

6)  Once the Executor receives Letters Testamentary (also known as Short Certificates), he can transfer assets from the name of the Decedent into estate accounts for the Decedent.  New Jersey automatically puts a lien on a Decedent's bank accounts, brokerage assets and real estate when a person passes away.  Banks will only release 50% of the assets to pay bills of the estate until they receive a tax waiver from the New Jersey Division of Tax.

7)  Shortly after qualifying as Executor, you must mail out a notice of probate to all people named in the Will AND all immediate next of kin, regardless of whether they are named in the Will or not.  This can be problematic if you wish to cut an heir out or cannot locate an heir.  I would also be a good reason to create an estate plan that will avoid probate.  If a charity is named as a beneficiary, then a notice must be sent to the Attorney General's office.

8) If the Executor did not already have access to a safe deposit box, he can do so at this point. 

9)  Within eight (8) month of the Decedent's date of death, the Executor must file a New Jersey Inheritance Tax Return and pay any taxes due.  Typically an inheritance tax return must be filed if assets are transferred to someone other than a spouse, civil union partner, child, grandchild, parent or charity.  There is a 3 year lookback.

10)  Within nine (9) months of the Decedent's date of death, the Executor must file a New Jersey Estate Tax Return and pay any taxes due.  A New Jersey Estate Tax Return must be filed if the TAXABLE estate is in excess of $675,000.  Note, the taxable estate can be different from the probate estate because the taxble estate may also include life insurance, retirement benefits, and joint accounts.  If the taxable estate is above $5,000,000 (indexed for inflation), a federal estate tax return must also be filed.  (It might be advisable to file this return in most situations on the death of the first spouse to pass on the Deceased Spouses unused tax exemption.) 

11)  The Executor must arrange for income tax returns to be filed and pay any taxes due. 

12)  The house must be cleaned and potentially sold or transferred.

13)  If there is real estate located in other jurisdictions, the Executor must do an ancillary probate.

14)  Other duties could include dealing with any business interests or intellectual property rights, assisting beneficiaries with any claims they might have for life insurance or retirement benefits, investigating the validity of claims against the estate and researching the proper title to assets.

15)  The executor should prepare an accounting for the estate.  This includes what the assets of the estate are, income, expenditures and distributions.  Unless the matter is contested, an informal accounting will usually suffice.

16)  Conduct child support searches on all beneficiaries.

17)  After the tax returns are filed and the estate receives tax waivers and all bills are paid, the Executor can transfer the assets of the estate as directed in the Will.

18)  Simultaneous with the transfers from the estate, an Executor should obtain a release and refunding bond.  This acts as a waiver to release the Executor from liability and a means by which the executor can retrieve the inheritance back in the event that new bills arise for the estate.

An executor is not required to hire an attorney to help out with an estate admistration, but it can make the process much smoother. 

Inheritance of Farm Exempt from Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax

Under a new Pennsylvania law, there will no longer be an inheritance tax on farms owned by decedents who passed away after June 30, 2012.   The purpose of the law was to preserve farmland from being sold following the death of the owner.

As always, there are a few caveats to the law.  First, the farm must be a working farm, not just empty farmland.  (As a practical matter, this means the farm must produce at least $2,000 per year in gross income.)  The law also applies to the value of agricultural assets, such as livestock, crops and timber.

Second, the law only applies to transfers to lineal descendants (i.e. children and grandchildren), lineal ascendants (parents and grandparents), a spouse and siblings of the decedent.  Importantly, it does NOT apply to transfers to nieces and nephews, same sex partners or other third parties.

Third, if the land ceases to be used as farmland within seven (7) years of the decedent's death, the inheritance tax will come due.  (As a result, the owner of the real estate must complete an annual form that the land still qualifies as farmland.)

For a copy of the relavent amendments to statute, please refer to Neil Hendershot's blog, PA EE&F Law Blog.

NJ Estate Tax - Case Study $2M

In New Jersey, tax planning and estate planning can be very important.  I'd like to show you a good representation of what a plan can do for a married couple with $2,000,000 in assets.  Let's assume that the couple has $800,000 of life insurance, a house worth $400,000, retirement accounts of $200,000, brokerage assets of $350,000, and $50,000 of other miscellaneous assets.  Let's also assume that they are both citizens and they have two young children from their marriage.

Without a will, everything will go to the survivng spouse, free of tax. However, on the death of the surviving spouse, there will be NJ Estate Tax of about $100,000.  Moreover, the two children would each receive $950,000 outright at age 18 and there would be no clear guardian named.

The biggest tax mistake most people make is that they leave everything outright to the surviving spouse.  The reason that this can be a tax mistake is because New Jersey allows each person to pass on $675,000 to their children (and grandchildren) before it taxes the estate.  If you do not use this $675,000 exemption, you lose it.  So the best way to preserve this tax exemption is to avoid giving the $675,000 outright to the surviving spouse and giving it to the surviving spouse and children in a trust.  Sometimes you will hear this referred to as a Bypass Trust, a Credit Shelter Trust or even a Family Trust.

Another big tax mistake most people make is to own life insurance on their own lives.  Most people think that life insurance passes to their heirs free of tax.  This is not true.  It is not subject to income tax or inheritance tax, but it IS subject to the Federal Estate Tax and to the NJ Estate Tax.  Usually the best way to avoid an estate tax on the payout from a life insurance policy is to have an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (also known as an ILIT) own the policy on the life of the insured.

So, knowing all this, let's come back to our couple.  The first thing that our couple should do is move the life insurance into a life insurance trust.  (It would be even better to have the trust buy a new life insurance policy because if you transfer a policy in to an ILIT, there will not be any tax benefits for 3 years.)

The second thing our couple should do is create Wills (or revocable living trusts).  In New Jersey, with most traditional couples, on the death of the first spouse, we will typically send the first $675,000 into a Bypass Trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse and the children.  (The $675,000 is really based upon a formula to allow the maximum amount possible to go into the this trust before there is a tax.  It various by state and also by the tax law at the time of the death of the first spouse.)  

If the first spouse to die owns more than $675,000, than that can either go outright to the surviving spouse or in a Marital Trust.  This is up to the couple to decide based upon how much they want to protect this money from creditors and future spouses.  Upon the death of the surviving spouse, everything that is in the name of the surviving spouse and everything that is in the trust for the surviving spouse gets combined and sent to the children.  If the children are young, we usually recommend that it goes to them in trust until they reach a more appropriate age.

Now that we have the plan in place, we must retitle the assets so that the plan will be effective. You see, a Will that states the first $675,000 goes to a surviving spouse in trust is useless unless the first spouse to die actually owns $675,000.  In our situation above, the house is most likely owned by husband and wife jointly, meaning it goes automatically to the surviving spouse outright regardless of what the Will says. Additionally, the life insurance and retirement accounts will most likely name the the surviving spouse as beneficiary.  For most couples, retitling the assets typically means moving the life insurance into the ILIT, preparing a new deed and otherwise moving assets around between the couple.   There is usually not much you can do with the retirement accounts.

The end result of this plan is that we will have moved $800,000 into a life insurance trust, reducing the taxable estate to $1,200,000.  The balance will be divided roughly equally between the husband and wife.  On the first to die, we send as much as we can into the Bypass Trust, utilizing their NJ Estate Tax exemption.  In this scenario, on the death of the second person, we will have reduced the NJ Estate Tax from $100,000 to $0. 

Another benefit to all this planning is that it can make the estate administration much easier and less costly.  In this econcomy, it is important to make things easier especially when you own real estate.  If you owe estate or inheritance taxes at the time of your death, a tax lien automatically attaches to the property and you will not be able to sell it with a clear title until the taxes are paid. 

Estate Planning for Same Sex Couples

In many jurisdictions, estate planning for same sex couples can be quite complex. In some states, the laws are favorable to non-traditional couples and in others, they are not (like Pennsylvania). There are also states like New Jersey, where the laws themselves can be favorable to same sex couples if you enter into a Civil Union, but there is still Tax Planning that must be done.

In states where the laws are unfavorable to same sex couples, without structuring your affairs properly, one partner may not inherit from the other. Moreover, without a Power of Attorney or Guardianship in place, one partner may even not be allowed to visit the other in a hospital or make financial or health care decisions for the other.

To structure your affairs properly, you should prepare a Will, Financial Power of Attorney, Health Care Power of Attorney and properly title your assets. The proper titling of your assets, including naming beneficiaries of your retirement accounts, life insurance policies, brokerage assets and bank accounts must not be overlooked. Without doing this, your plan will fail.

If you are ready to make a commitment to each other, you should take advantage of whatever laws the state you live in offers, whether it is a marriage, a Civil Union or a Domestic Partnership. To give you an idea of some of the benefits this can offer:

1. In NJ, a civil union partner and a domestic partner are entitled to receive the death certificate of the deceased partner.


2. A surviving civil union partner is automatically allowed to inherit as if he or she was a surviving spouse; and


3. A surviving civil union partner is deemed to be first in line to act as an administrator (if the decedent has failed to prepare a Will) or guardian (if the partner has failed to prepare a Power of Attorney).

You should also be aware that New Jersey has not updated all of its statutes to comply with their own Civil Union Law. For example, 37:1-31 states that NJ Civil Union Couples shall have all the rights of married couples. However, the inheritance tax law does not use the phrase Civil Union Couples - only domestic partners, as it was last updated prior to the enactment of the Civil Union law. Even though the inheritance tax statute has not been updated, NJ Division of Taxation has updated its forms and I have not heard of any instances in which NJ has tried to tax the surviving partners of a civil union.

Among the things that I find get overlooked when same sex couples plan for themselves is that they do not consider what will happen to their assets if both of them should pass simultaneously nor do they consider the most tax efficient way to structure their assets. So while much of the material here you may have read elsewhere, you should realize that a good estate planning attorney can help you customize a comprehensive, tax efficient plan for you.

Is there an Inheritance Tax on Life Insurance Proceeds?

One of the biggest misconceptions people have about life insurance is how it should be taxed. Most people think that they can receive the proceeds completely tax free. Upon the death of the insured, the beneficiary of a policy can almost always receive the proceeds without paying an income tax. However, estate taxes and inheritance taxes are a different matter.

If the insured owns a life insurance policy on his or her own name, it is subject to the federal estate tax. It is also subject to the state estate taxes of many states, including the New Jersey Estate Tax and the New York Estate Tax. This is one of the reasons many people have a life insurance trust own the life insurance on their lives. It is also one of the reasons that many people name their children as the owners of their life insurance policies.

The inheritance tax has its own set of rules for how a life insurance policy should be taxed. In Pennsylvania, the death benefit from a life insurance policy is always free of inheritance tax.  

However, in New Jersey, it depends upon whether the policy is payable to an individual beneficiary or the estate of the insured.  If the policy is payable to an individual in New Jersey, then there is no inheritance tax.  If the policy is payable to the estate of the insured, then there may be an inheritance tax depending upon who the beneficiary of the estate is.

Under the New Jersey Inheritance Tax scheme, if the proceeds pass to a spouse, civil union partner, child, grandchild, parent, grandparent or a charity, then there is no inheritance tax. However, if the money passes to a sibling, then there could be anywhere from an 11-15% inheritance tax. Generally, if the money passes to anyone else, then there is a 15-16% tax depending upon how much is transferred.

As a result of these rules, it is usually best to consider who will be a beneficiary of your estate before deciding which assets you wish to go to whom. For example, if you know you want to benefit a niece or a nephew, using life insurance is one of the most tax efficient ways to do it.

Please contact us if you wish to discuss planning with life insurance in more depth.

----
Updated on 12/31/12. 

Dangers of Specific Bequests and General Bequests

WHAT ARE SPECIFIC GIFTS AND GENERAL GIFTS?
A specific bequest is a gift of a specific piece of property to a specific person. Three examples of this are:

1. I give my real estate, located at 1 Main Street, Anytown, State, to my son, Jake Smith.


2. I give my 500 shares of stock of XYZ Corporation to my nephew, Jordan Smith.


3. I give all of my money in Bank Account number #1 at Big Bank, to my daughter, Samantha Smith.

A general bequest is a gift of a specific amount, made to a specific person. This is considered a general bequest because only the value of the property is relevant, not its source. An example of a general bequest is: I leave $10,000 to my niece, Jody Smith. (It is not important from where the $10,000 comes from.)

If the testator states the source of the funds, this is a general bequest known as a demonstrative gift. An example of this is: I give $10,000 to my cousin, Jamie Smith, from my account number #1 at Big Bank. The gift amount is general, but the source of the funds is specific.

If you just leave everything to a specific person or persons, this is known as a residuary gift. I will not be discussing them in detail here.

HOW CAN THERE BE A DANGER IN MAKING A GIFT?
Some of the dangers that can arise from an improperly drafted specific bequest include ademption, confusion, an unequal sharing of taxes and an unequal sharing of expenses.

ADEMPTION
Ademption is the term used when the decedent no longer owns the property that he or she is giving away. For example, if the decedent in the example above sold 1 Main Street shortly before his death and purchased 2 Main Street, then Jake Smith will get nothing. Because the decedent does not own 1 Main Street at the time of his death, he cannot possibly give it to Jake and the property is considered to be adeemed.

Another huge problem with ademption occurs when an agent under a power of attorney sells the property. Then, it will depend upon the state whether the beneficiary gets something or not as some states require that the beneficiary receive an amount equal to the fair market value of the property. I prefer not to specifically name anyone as the beneficiary of real estate or other large ticket items, and if the client insists, I require that they tell me what they would want to do if the property is sold before they die.

CONFUSION
Confusion can result in a number of different ways. One way it can result is if one of the people named as beneficiaries dies - what happens to the bequest? It may depend upon the state. Some states say that the gift goes to the children of the deceased beneficiary. Some states say that the gift lapses. I prefer to explain what happens in all cases and not rely on state law. I will add one of the following in every case: "If Jody Smith does not survive me, this gift shall lapse." or ""If Jody Smith does not survive me, this gift shall be distributed to..."

Another cause of confusion can arise from gifts of stock. What happens if the stock splits or the company creates a subsidiary or is bought out? The answer to this can vary by state. Unless the testator is the owner of a small business and we are engaged in business succession planning, I usually advise clients not to make specific gifts of stock.

AN UNEQUAL SHARING OF TAXES
Making a specific or a general gift can result in an unequal tax burden because in many states, like New Jersey and Pennsylvania, there is an inheritance tax. Beneficiaries will be taxed differently depending upon their relationship to the decedent. So, if a New Jersey decedent left $10,000 to his son and $10,000 to his nephew, the nephew's gift would result in a 15% tax, but there would not be any tax on the bequest to his son.

If a Pennsylvania decedent left $10,000 to his daughter and $10,000 to his brother, the bequest to his daughter would result in a 4.5% tax and the bequest to his brother would result in an 12% inheritance tax. For a full range of all the different tax rates, please review this inheritance tax chart.

So, who should pay the tax in these situations? You can have three results:

1. Each person who receives money pays their own taxes at their own rate.


2. They split the taxes equally.


3. The residuary beneficiaries (possible a third party) can be required to pay the taxes.

Each state has a different requirement, but the testator can override state law by stating who should pay the taxes. A good attorney will help you identify when this might be an issue and help you decide how the taxes should be paid.

AN UNEQUAL SHARING OF EXPENSES
A similar analysis can be made for the unequal sharing of expenses. If you leave $90,000 to your daughter in a specific bequest and leave everything else to your son, most Wills require that the expenses of the estate administration be paid out of the residuary. This may be fine if your son is getting more than your daughter, but what if it's the same or less? These kind of issues must be dealt with in the estate planning stage, not after a person's death.

Estate Administration can be a bit complex, so make sure you contact an an experienced probate attorney if you even have the slightest doubt about how to handle any of these issues.

Step-Up in Basis Rule - Common Mistakes

When a person sells property, that person has to pay a tax on the gain from the sale. Gain is determined by subtracting the sales price of the object from the basis of such object. For example, if I sold a stock for $100 and the basis was $40, the gain would be $60.

The basis of an object is generally the price a person has paid for it. However, if you pay money to improve the object (such as buying an addition onto a house), the basis will increase. If you depreciate an object for tax purposes, the basis will decrease. To more on the basics of basis, see my post: Understanding Basis.

Notwithstanding the crazy rules for an individual who may have passed in 2010, Section 1014 of the Internal Revenue Code states that if a person holds property at the time of his or her death, it will receive a new basis equal to the fair market value of such property at the person's date of death. This is known as the Step-up In Basis Rule because in almost all circumstances, the fair market value of the assets owned by a decedent is greater than the basis of in the decedent's hands just before he or she died.

However, the Step-up In Basis Rule is really more accurately called the Fair-Market Value Date of Death because, especially in this economy, there is a chance that the date of death value is less than the basis just before death. So the first mistake many people make is in not selling assets before they pass on which they can take a loss. If you bought stock for $20,000 and now it is only worth $10,000, consider selling it. If you sell it before you die, you can take the tax loss, if you keep it until you die, your heirs cannot claim that tax benefit.

If you are an executor or an elder law practitioner, you should also be aware that you have the option of valuing all assets under Section 2032 alternate valuation date. The alternate valuation date is six months following the date of death. So let's say on the date of death the assets are worth $5,500,000 and six months following the date of death they are worth $5,000,000. Unless there is a state estate tax, you may be better off using the alternate valuation date so that the beneficiaries have a higher basis in the property, even if there is a small federal estate tax. On the other hand, if, six months after the date of death, the assets are worth more, you are not permitted to use the 2032 elections.*  (See 2032(c).) The second common mistake made by many is to not wait the six months and run the calculations for both scenarios.

So, if the beneficiaries of a descendant's property get to take appreciated property with a step up in basis, why don't people just transfer their property to a sick relative and then have them bequeath it back them when the sick relative dies. Well, unfortunately, this rarely works. Often times, it can result in a gift tax, inheritance tax or estate tax. Additionally, under Section 1014(e), if you receive a property by gift, you have to hold it for one year before your heirs can get the benefit of the step-up in basis rule. This is the third common mistake. When doing an estate administration, many practitioners and accountants fail to adequately track the basis of the assets.

*Updated on 5/5/14.  Thanks to Bob Derber for pointing out that I also made a common mistake!

Deathbed Transfers in New Jersey

Often times, a person who is on his or her deathbed will make gifts to family members in an effort to reduce the potential taxes owed.

For transfers to anyone other than a charity, making gifts in a way that minimizes taxes is actually a very complex process. In deciding whether to make a gift, you must consider the amount of the gift, the type of asset you wish to transfer, to whom it is going to and the basis in the gifted item.

Taxes That Must be Considered When Making Gifts

There are generally six taxes that might be triggered as result of the gift. These include the New Jersey estate tax, the New Jersey inheritance tax, the federal estate tax, the federal gift tax, the capital gains tax and the generation skipping transfer (GST) tax.

I discuss all of these taxes in more detail elsewhere, but to quickly review the general purpose of each tax:

1. The New Jersey estate tax is imposed by the state on transfers at death to the extent the decedent's net estate exceeds $675,000 and the money passes to someone other than a charity, surviving spouse, domestic partner or civil union partner.


2. The New Jersey inheritance tax is also a tax imposed on transfers at death. However, the inheritance tax is based more upon who the money is going to rather than the amount involved. New Jersey does offer a dollar for dollar credit against its estate tax for any inheritance tax paid.


3. The federal estate tax is imposed by the federal government on transfers at death to the extent the decedent's estate exceeds $5,000,000 and the money passes to someone other than a charity or a surviving spouse.


4. The federal gift tax is imposed by the federal government on transfers during a person's lifetime to the extent the person's lifetime gifts exceed $5,000,000 and the money is transferred to someone other than a charity or a spouse.


5. The generation skipping transfer tax (also known as the GST Tax) is generally assessed by the federal government on transfers during life or at death to a person's grandchildren, or more remote descendants to the extent such transfers exceed $5,000,000.


6. The capital gains tax imposed on the sale of appreciated property, stock or similar assets.

As you may have noticed, only four of the six taxes named above are directly attributable to a transfer being made as the result of someone dying. The reason that a lifetime gift can be taxed at the donor's death is because New Jersey and the federal government have lookback provisions. Lookback provisions basically say that if you make a certain kind of transfer, the government can tax it at your death even if you gave the money away during your life. As you can imagine, this creates a host of problems including finding a way to pay for the tax.

What is a Deathbed Gift?

New Jersey defines deathbed gifts as gifts made in contemplation of death (N.J.S.A. 54:34-1(c)). People usually know the deathbed gift rule as the three year lookback rule because gifts made within three years of death are presumed to be in contemplation of death. If a gift is made in contemplation of death, and the gift was over $500, then New Jersey asserts it was really a transfer at death subject to the inheritance tax.

For New Jersey tax purposes, this particular three year rule ONLY appears under the NJ inheritance tax statutes. There is a very different rule for the New Jersey estate tax because the New Jersey estate tax generally follows the federal estate tax for determining what is taxable and what is not taxable. I will discuss this in more detail below.

Since gifts made in contemplation of death are subject to an inheritance tax, and the inheritance tax only applies for transfers to certain beneficiaries, it is important to know how New Jersey classifies the beneficiaries of the gift.

Determining the Class of the Beneficiary

To determine if a lifetime gift will result in a New Jersey inheritance tax, the first thing that you must do is differentiate between gifts made to Class A beneficiaries, Class C beneficiaries and Class D beneficiaries.

Class A beneficiaries include the decedent's spouse, civil union partner, domestic partner, all lineal descendants (such as children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren), all lineal ascendants (such as parents, grandparents and great-grandparents) and step-children. An adopted child, grandchild or great-grandchild is also considered a lineal descendant. Transfers to Class A beneficiaries are exempt from the NJ inheritance tax, meaning there is no inheritance tax on deathbed gifts or transfers at death to such individuals.
Class C beneficiaries include the decedent's brother or sister and son-in-law or daughter-in-law of the decedent even if the decedent's child is also deceased. Class D beneficiaries includes everyone else (most notably nieces and nephews).

If the gift is made to a Class C Beneficiary, and the gift was over $25,000, there definitely will be a NJ inheritance tax if the gift was made "in contemplation of death". If the gift was made more than 3 years prior to the decedent passing, it will not be subject to a NJ inheritance tax.

If the gift is made to a Class D Beneficiary, and the gift was over $500, there definitely will be a NJ inheritance tax if the gift was made in contemplation of death. If the gift was made more than 3 years prior to the decedent passing, it will not be subject to a NJ inheritance tax.

If the deathbed gift is subject to the New Jersey inheritance tax, there will be a tax due of 11-16% of the transferred amount. There is an 11-16% tax on transfers to Class C beneficiaries on the gifted amount in excess of $25,000 and a 15-16% tax on the entire transfer to Class D beneficiaries if the gift is in excess of $500. The more that is transferred, the higher the rate will be.

As an example, assume I owned $5,000,000, and I gifted away $1,000,000 to my nieces and nephews four years ago, $3,500,000 to my nieces and nephews this year and then died within three years, leaving the remaining $500,000 to my two siblings. The $1,000,000 gift to my nieces and nephews would not be subject to a New Jersey inheritance tax because it was longer than three years ago. The first $700,000 of the $3,500,000 deathbed gift to my nieces and nephews would be taxed at a 15% inheritance tax rate ($105,000). The remaining $2,800,000 would be taxed at a 16% inheritance tax rate ($448,000). For the transfers to my siblings, $50,000 will pass free of taxes, and the remaining $450,000 will be taxed at an 11% inheritance tax rate ($49,500). In total, there will be a $602,500 NJ inheritance tax.

For gifts to charity in any amount and gifts of less than $500 to any person, there is an easy answer - it is not subject to an inheritance tax in New Jersey.
Regardless of what classification a beneficiary is in, there MAY BE a New Jersey estate tax and/or federal estate tax if the gift is subject to a three year lookback under the federal estate tax rules or a lifetime lookback if the gifted items are in excess of the annual exclusion amount.

Certain Transfers are Automatically Subject to a Three Year Lookback for Estate Tax Purposes

Under Section 2035 of the Internal Revenue Code there is a limited three year lookback that most significantly applies to life insurance policies transferred within three years of death.
A. Life Insurance: If you learn nothing else from this post, make sure you learn this:

1. If a decedent OWNS a life insurance policy insuring his or her own life, the entire death benefit is subject to both the New Jersey estate tax AND the federal estate tax. Many people assume life insurance proceeds are tax free. While this is true for income tax, it is not true for estate tax. The only relief is if the beneficiary is a charity, a surviving spouse, a civil union partner or domestic partner because then the estate may be entitled to a deduction;


2. If the decedent transferred OWNERSHIP of the policy on his life to another party within three years of death, the 2035 rule kicks in and it is considered a taxable deathbed gift.

B. You should also be aware that the Section 2035 lookback rule also applies to certain interests in trusts and real estate. This does not affect most people, so I will not discuss them here.

Gifts in Excess of the Annual Exclusion Amount

Currently, each United States citizen and permanent resident alien can give away $13,000 to as many donees as he or she wishes. This is known as the federal annual exclusion amount or 2503(b) exclusion. Gifts in excess of the federal annual exclusion amount result in a "taxable gift". Usually there is no immediate out of pocket expense though because New Jersey does not have a gift tax and the federal government will only institute a gift tax if the sum of these gifts exceeds the lifetime exclusion amount (currently $5,000,000).

When calculating the New Jersey estate tax, we are required to look not just at what a person owned when he or she died, but also the taxable gifts that the decedent made over his or her lifetime.

In most situations, if the decedent's taxable estate, including prior taxable gifts, is in excess of the New Jersey estate tax exemption amount (currently $675,000), there will be a New Jersey estate tax. However, there is a big difference in the tax depending upon whether the decedent died with estate over the $675,000 threshhold or died with an estate under the $675,000 threshhold, but is deemed to have an estate in excess of $675,000 due to the lookback provisions.

As an example, assume I owned $5,000,000, and I gifted away $4,500,000 to my daughters and then died in 2012 as a widower, leaving the remaining $500,000 in my estate to my children. Normally, there would be no estate tax on a New Jersey estate of only $500,000, but we must add back the prior gifts. Even adding back the prior taxable gifts, it would only produce a $10,000 NJ estate tax. (To learn how this is calculated, you will need to prepare a 2001 Form 706 federal estate tax return and a New Jersey estate tax return. I will discuss this in future post, entitled "Deathbed Transfers in New Jersey - Advanced")

To realize the benefit of making this gift, you should know that if I had died with the entire $5,000,000, my estate would have to pay a $391,600 New Jersey estate tax. In years past, nobody would give away more than a $1,000,000 because that was the old lifetime gift limit for federal gift tax purposes. Any gifts above $1,000,000 were taxed at a very high gift tax rate. However, with a $5,000,000 lifetime federal gifting limit and no New Jersey gift tax, there is ample opportunity for planning to avoid or drastically reduce the New Jersey estate tax.

You should also be aware that if you do make a gift in excess of the annual exclusion amount, you should file a federal gift tax return (Form 706). If a lifetime transfer is in excess of the federal annual exclusion amount, it could lead to a federal estate tax or a federal gift tax at some future time. To minimize this possibility, you should try to structure gifts over longer periods of time and for an amount equal to or less than the annual exclusion amount. To read more about this, see my article entitled: Federal Estate and Gift Taxation of Deathbed Gifts.

The Importance of Knowing the Basis of the Gifted Item

It is important to know the basis of the property that is being gifted. If the donor is gifting cash, the basis is exactly the amount of the gift. If the donor is gifting property or stock, it may be unwise to make the deathbed gift because there could be substantial built-in capital gains.

When property is gifted away, the donee usually takes the property with a basis equal to that of the donor's basis. (For more on basis, see my post on Understanding Basis.) If the donor keeps property until his or her death, the recepient will receive the property with a new basis equal to the fair market value of that property on the date of the death. This is often referred to as a step-up in basis rule, although in this economy it may be a step-down in basis.

Let's assume I give away a real estate property worth $4,500,000 to my daughters shortly before I die to save on the New Jersey estate tax. If my basis in the property was only $1,000,000, the kids will take the property with that same basis. If my kids sell it immediately after I die for $4,500,000, there will be a 15% capital gains tax on the $3,500,000 of built in gain. This will produce a federal capital gains tax of $525,000 and probably a New Jersey income tax of $315,000. As discussed above, the New Jersey estate tax would have only been $391,600 if I had held onto the property.

Due to the carryover basis rule, it is usually best not to give away appreciated property during life. It is usually better to pay a smaller estate or inheritance tax than to risk losing the step-up in basis on the decedent's death.

Summary

In summary, large deathbed gifts are not necessarily going to be taxed after the donor passes. Whether there will be a New Jersey tax on a deathbed gift is based upon whether the transaction has occurred in the last three years, to whom the item is being gifted, the type of asset being gifted and on the size of the donor's net estate after factoring in prior gifts.

When all is said and done, even if there is a New Jersey tax (estate or inheritance), large gifts made to Class A beneficiaries prior to death and large gifts made to Class C and D beneficiaries more than three years prior to death will greatly reduce the overall estate and inheritance tax liability unless the donor is making a gift of a highly appreciated asset.

Simple, right?

-------------------
I want to give a special thank you to Martin Bearg, Esq., Rekha Rao, Esq., Rebecca Esmi, Esq., and to individuals at the New Jersey Transfer Inheritance Tax Branch (who wish to remain anonymous) for taking the time to speak with me about this and helping me to gather my thoughts.